RustyWizard

joined 2 years ago
[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev 27 points 3 months ago

Yeah, super awkward. If you were being specific to his followers, you’d say Catholics. If you’re being generic, you’d say his admirers or whatever. “Christians” is such a weird middle ground that includes some people who followed him religiously and some who didn’t but appreciated him anyway.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

Because that makes members of Congress more likely to sign off on spending bills, not because Alabama is a great place for it.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev 72 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Prove him wrong and drive my motorcycle into a highway median at top speed 5 minutes later. I’ll be god dammed if I’m gonna let some doctor think he got the better of me.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've trained my arms for 3 days in a row, nothing fancy: upright rows, bent-over rows and triceps kickbacks, 10 repetitions each, 2 rounds. After that I'm so sore I cannot do more, so I turn to cardio and do planks (front and side) and some yoga.

Really recommend finding a workout split. I do push, pull, legs x2 and an hour on the stationary bike on Sundays. Monday is push, so my chest, tris, and shoulders are all hit. Then they’re rested the next two days when I get back to push. You could do also do a bro split or just find something that works best for you. The important part is that you’re giving your muscles time to rest between sessions.

On that note, the most effective way to gain muscle is to be in a calorie surplus, train to failure, and progressive overload (and steroids). So make sure you’re gaining weight (slowly, don’t just start bingeing cake). Push your sets to the point where you can no longer keep form. Try to lift more than you did last time (either more reps or more weight).

Don’t skip legs. I don’t mean cardio, do some actual resistance work on your legs or prepare to find yourself top heavy. “Skipping leg day” is a meme for a reason.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago

What exactly do you think my thesis is?

What exactly do you think “support” entails?

It’s clear you lost the plot on the first question ages ago and you have a child’s perspective on the second.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev 26 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Geoffrey Farrow at Raphael, a jeweller on the other side of the street, can only just bring himself to sell lab-grown diamonds. “They are synthetic,” he said. “Lab-grown sounds exotic, but it’s created – they make it by the buckets. There’s no history to it. The price is going to go down further and further.

“It makes the stone that much cheaper, and people have the illusion that being big is something special. It’s not. It’s quality that you want.”

What the actual fuck is he talking about? Is it the suffering that gives it quality? They’re impossible to tell apart without a magnifying glass.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

There haven’t been any new arguments for a while. You repeat the same junk about how you’re a victim because you’re not able to access the IRS in the fashion you zealously demand. You continue to be hilariously upset about getting called out on basic definitions. And you continue to talk about classes and school. I’m 100% certain you’re a child. Maybe fresh out of college.

Grow up.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

You keep beating on this phrase because your zealotry has pushed you to a singular idea of what “support” means. Another word you might consider looking up in the dictionary.

They don’t support tor. They aren’t obligated to, morally nor legally. Any argument that they are is founded on zealotry and ignorance. If you feel undignified or a lack of respect because you can’t use your favorite browser, then you’re an idiot.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I don’t think anyone is embarrassed to be not supporting tor, bud. What’s embarrassing is throwing a fit about it, misunderstanding basic English, tossing out trash analogies, attacking strawmen, and being a massive whiner because you can’t use your protocol of choice.

Saying “whoosh” doesn’t make your analogy any less shitty. Further, explaining how your analogy was inaccurate just proves the point.

There is no moral obligation to support tor. I get it. You’re a zealot. Nobody gives a shit. Sucks to fall hard on a niche utility. Grow up and move on.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago (8 children)

You are neither legally owed nor morally owed tor access.

Not supporting tor does not indicate a security fault.

The McDonald’s analogy doesn’t apply to the context of this discussion. You’re morally outraged that McDonald’s doesn’t provide plastic straws. Instead of using the straws provided, not using a straw, or bringing your own plastic straws, you’re yelling that they’re poisoning the drinks.

There are other ways to handle your taxes, if you find them lousy or undignified, that’s a real bummer for you.

Your opinions on security are worthless. You are clearly an uninformed zealot.

[–] RustyWizard@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago (10 children)

You keep trying to pull this down to semantics because you don’t have a leg to stand on. Nobody owes you tor access. Nobody is obligated to allow tor access.

You have options, you’re just refusing to use them, probably because you just picked up using tor for the first time out of high school and, like all young idealists, took a hard line on it. Grow up.

Really recommend you go look at a dictionary, thesaurus, and some introductory material on security.

view more: next ›