RoyalEasy

joined 2 years ago
[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Guess we're allowed to call out communists here, but fascists are A-OK.

What a joke of a com.

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

He already said he doesn't care.

Which really begs the question: why did he use that defense if it literally didn't matter?

Because, like I told him, conservatives think things are true because they believe them. It's why I asked if it would change his mind— I knew it wouldn't, and I love it when they out themselves as the liars they are.

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (14 children)

I'm not reading your fascist screed, get bent Nazi.

You've already said you don't care about the truth, this conversation is as worthless as that brain you have rattling around in your head.

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (18 children)

Oh there's a big surprise: a far-right wingnut will continue to lie for the Nazis despite the truth being very obvious.

How very postmodern of you. The truth is just what you believe, huh?

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (20 children)

Would it change your mind? Because it seems like the Holocaust denialism and should have done that already, unless you're just playing along like all right-wingers do.

The AfD’s chairman in Frankfurt, Wilko Möller, called the criticism “absurd” and said the poster was merely aimed at illustrating that the party cared for children. “What better way to show this than with a roof over the head, which the adults symbolically represent with their arms to protect the children,” he said.

Sounds like you're looking for any excuses to give these guys a pass just because they share the same far-right political alignment as you.

Matthias Helferich was elected to the German parliament in 2021 but resigned his seat after prompting outrage by his declaration in a leaked internet chat that he was “the friendly face of the Nazis”.

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (42 children)

They're not exactly subtle about being Nazis. Weird that you jump to defend them unless you're a Nazi yourself?

And looking at your profile, that's one question answered.

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, here comes the lecture about how I'm offended because I'm laughing at some jagoff who can't tell fantasy from reality.

It's hilarious when people who believe in magic attribute their feelings to other people because they simply can't understand how someone else could feel differently than they do.

Here's a hint: people who laugh at clowns aren't offended by them.

Besides, the devil made me do it.

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Oh no, the devil has me in his clutches LMAO!

You definitely showed everyone this secret knowledge that you possess and didn't come off looking like a nut who is brainwashed into believing nonsense. You sound totally sensible.

I'll tongue kiss the devil's ass in remembrance of you. Jesus wants his turn first though; any messages I should pass onto the "big" guy?

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's so funny when people who believe in magic try to get rational people to take it seriously.

Satan's gon' getcha! Ooga Booga!!!

LMAO!!

Here's a safety tip: don't say "Bloody Mary" in front of a mirror three times or she'll come by and ruin your whole night. And stay away from those ouija boards, they're the debil's pager.

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

You could go to another site but then you wouldn't get the attention that you crave.

You need us "assholes."

[–] RoyalEasy@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I got banned from the /conservative community on .ee because one of those idiots was saying that Democrats are the ones who support the Confederacy.

I posted five pics of traitor flags at Trump rallies and the mod banned me for "bad faith."

He left up the lies that I refuted though, just like a cryptofascist would.

view more: ‹ prev next ›