Imagine a child's first experience with sexuality being porn of their teacher. We all know that porn dehumanizes women, but imagine how it will affect children when that person is someone they know in real life?
Okay, but the first response to that should be "sit down with your child and discuss appropriate boundaries," not "fire the teacher." Holy fuck stop being afraid to be a parent and just talk to your damn children, people.
God I love this picture. It's like a Renaissance painting, so much going on.
I think if they're writing books with that kind of material, then yes - I'd fire nabakov immediately for example
If you think Lolita was condoning its subject matter then you completely misunderstood the entire message of the book. This is why we need media literacy.
Hot take, elementary school kids shouldn't be held to the same standards of adults. They shouldn't have access to pornography and they especially shouldn't have access to pornography of people they know in real life.
Hot take, it's not the teacher's responsibility to keep children from accessing sexually explicit material, it's the parent's. If children are accessing the OF account of someone they know in real life, then the parents need to sit down and have a frank, age-appropriate discussion with them about sex work, porn, and appropriate boundaries.
Unironically this.
Enjoying sex is woke
Imagine complaining about LGBT in manga when yuri and yaoi have been famously popular themes in manga for decades.
Why yes I do love it when my sim has a queue full of actions but decides to instead just stand there for half an hour doing nothing
CNN uses Gun Violence Archive as their source for that number, as does that Wikipedia article. That link actually shows 49, which means there was another mass shooting in the hour since my previous comment. Way to go Amerikkka 
https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/kansas-city-chiefs-parade-shooting-02-14-24/index.html
The shooting is at least the 48th mass shooting in the United States so far this year
We're not even 48 days into the year yet
When they use that weaselly passive voice it means it was likely the cops who shot them. Just like that Houston church shooting the other day, if they say "people were ~~shot~~ struck" but don't directly say it was the shooter in question then it was probably the cops who did it.
We love all our LGBTQ+ comrades