yeah all this corporeal form maintenance bullshit fuckin sucks. i'm trying to focus and do a thing, whoops my body needs to expel excess fluids, now I have to stop what I'm doing and lose my focus to go to the bathroom. really getting into a project, too bad body needs rest, time for eight hours of get fucked. i don't want this mortal form, just let me be a being of pure energy already
Rom
joined 2 years ago
Superliminal is a really good surreal game that forces you to think outside the box, though it's short and you can easily complete it in one sitting.
Same, I just need like, one person who understands me and I'll be completely happy to just stay at home forever and never interact with any other human beings ever again.
Super secret dupe glitch, drop your rune armor on the ground and press alt F4 and you'll have two of them!
Same, I thought this was just a shitpost. Still not entirely certain that account isn't a bit.
First of all, I didn't say Lolita is indistinguishable from novels with LGBTQ+ themes, I said that you are indistinguishable from GOP book banners.
child abuse material
Oh my god shut the fuck up already. You have been told multiple times, in no uncertain terms, that Lolita is not a pornographic novel. Until you read the book, nothing you say matters, because you have made it perfectly clear you are profoundly ignorant on the subject matter, and despite every attempt by other people in this thread who have tried to politely correct you on this misunderstanding, you continue to repeat the same ignorant takes on this novel over and over again. You are, again, indistinguishable from a reactionary who makes up their mind on something and refuses to budge despite all overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
@SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml told you in another part of this thread that "the protagonist is a horrible monster who shouldn't be trusted is literally in the opening. In no uncertain terms" so I'll even share that passage with you:
I have no intention to glorify “H.H.” No doubt, he is horrible, he is abject, he is a shining example of moral leprosy, a mixture of ferocity and jocularity that betrays supreme misery perhaps, but is not conducive to attractiveness. He is ponderously capricious. Many of his casual opinions on the people and scenery of this country are ludicrous. A desperate honesty that throbs through his confession does not absolve him from sins of diabolical cunning. He is abnormal. He is not a gentleman. But how magically his singing violin can conjure up a tendresse, a compassion for Lolita that makes us entranced with the book while abhorring its author!
Shut the fuck up and read the fucking book. Seriously, I don't want to read another comment from you about this book until you have read it, because you have made it entirely clear you have zero clue what the actual novel is about.
Regardless, I'm done with this conversation. Best of luck, hope you learn something today.
'Fantasy' implies it was written as an erotic novel, rather than a critique of child abuse. The narrative makes it very clear that the protagonist is a monster and that everything he did was horrible. For the last time please read the book and educate yourself about it before passing judgement, because banning a book you haven't read but you think is pornographic despite everyone telling you otherwise makes you indistinguishable from the GOP freaks who are banning every book from school libraries that so much as acknowledges the existence of LGBTQ+ people.
Once again, Lolita is not a fantasy about child abuse. Please read the book.
So if someone says "child abuse is bad" they should be banned from teaching, because they said something about child abuse, do I have this right?
Same as anything else, really. If they say or do something that's inappropriate, you sit them down and have a discussion about why it was inappropriate. Use it as an opportunity to teach the child the right way to treat other people. That's the whole reason why children have adults in their lives, to teach them right from wrong and protect them from harm. Children who are old enough to actively search for sexually explicit material probably aren't going to be harmed by viewing the sexually explicit material itself, but if they're viewing sexually explicit material of adults in their lives, then they should understand it would make those adults uncomfortable, so if they're going to look at porn they should stick to (consensual) porn of strangers (obviously with the caveat of "porn isn't representative of real sex and can be problematic in its own ways" but that's its own discussion).
Putin Distraught Over Friends Who Keep Dying Under Mysterious Circumstances
Common Onion W