Rolder

joined 2 years ago
[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wonder if it would help to watch content where you have already watched with subtitles. So you have a rough idea of what’s going on already and your brain has more bandwidth to process the words themselves

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Guarantee it wasn’t written out first until they had people argue about it

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago

Head guy has got the best job. Nothing in his mouth and doesn’t have to do anything

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm, I think I’d rather have a cool cyberpunk robot limb then just regrowing my shitty old flesh and blood one

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Well sure but if you can make a nuclear reactor you can make a nuclear bomb

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

The Japanese at the time were, at the least, very close in terms of evilness. What with the crazy human experiments, execution of prisoners, and everything they did to the Chinese.

This obviously does not reflect on modern day Japan.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well then we wouldn’t have nuclear power either

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

So in other words, America isn’t running on true capitalism?

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good ol America where your options are corporate captured, or corporate captured but with slurs and hate speech.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

True, they kind of ride that line between neutral and evil for sure.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’d lean more towards amoral, but it certainly doesn’t help that they were reincarnated into a war setting. I’d probably lean lawful neutral to put it in d&d alignment

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

My point being more that someone who already had kids is less likely to want to have more. Simple as that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›