Thank you for the feedback.
Mostly just the whole thing of talking a lot about inclusivity without doing anything to actually help.
We used to use a printable sheet called press'n'peel with a laser printer.
Corpo = corporate, DEI = diversity equality/equity inclusion. The kind of cya (cover your ass) policy corporations have, that is neither diverse nor equal nor inclusive.
Skeet shooting with prizes?
How many 14 year olds can afford a lawyer?
My point was more that instance admins defed for things that are comparatively minor, relative to allowing anonymous posting, not that allowing anonymous posting is a good idea (even if it's technically possible).
Calling a random twitter spat a "feud" is the new "slammed" of clickbait headlines.
He talks a lot about inclusivity, but the design isn't open source, very corpo DEI.
IIRC that's down to mastodon's implementation of outboxes being broken.
It could always use an "anonymous" pseudo-account, (ie, have anonymous posts federate as anonymous@instance.com), or a pseudo-account per post (anonymous1@instance.com, anonymous2, etc). Thinking about it, the former has the advantage of being easy to block by instances or comms that don't like it.
The Muppet Christmas Carol