keep their code yet remove attribution
Isn't that a violation of the GPL?
He makes a habit of that tbh (See tivoization, etc)
risc-v saw this coming a while ago and moved to Switzerland to avoid it.
Will be interesting to see if openharmony gets updated to be based on this.
It's more of an example of how we don't have anywhere near enough storage for existing renewables.
Depressingly, probably true.
Hence the "I’m not saying he should have to". To clarify, I'm asking if there's some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
Remind me, what does the "e" in "e-commerce" stand for again?
My interpretation is they wanted to use it, got denied, so used a more generic setting instead.
I'm not saying he should have to, but is there a reason he can't just submit, "video evidence"
A third party becoming relevant, if not actually winning, could do.
Of course, the last time that happened in the USA they imprisoned the leader.