Not voting for someone who is aiding and abetting genocide is morally correct, it's not complicated.
If genocide isn't a red line for you, what is?
As someone who's been following him for some time, I think the article is a little doomerish. His stance on vaccines is troubling, but he's outlined policies he'd want to see, like capping drug prices and banning pesticides that are banned in europe, before https://www.wsj.com/opinion/trump-can-make-america-healthy-again-rfk-jr-reforms-chronic-disease-crisis-a9b4b8c0
I get access denied from the link, here's an archive version for anyone that gets the same https://archive.ph/SSMPK
Need more capacity for all the liberal tears?
It was a cool project, but it never seemed like a good business model.
Meanwhile the CEO is paid nearly $7M a year.
As a non-american, this seems unsurprising. The Harris campaign seemed to be running the same playbook as the Clinton one did. The main reason anyone gave for voting for her was not being trump, effectively making her the satus quo candidate. If everything is shit for you under the current status quo, that doesn't encourage you to vote for her.
The way people get so emotionally invested into it.
Do you think they made it a tie on purpose? They knew they had the chance to troll the entire country and took it, lol.
Before smartphones people had to want to "go on the internet", and know how to use a web browser. Now many people only know how to access "the internet" through "apps" to corporate controlled walled gardens like facebook, tiktok, etc.
On the other hand, the eternal September effect from smartphones ruined the internet. What will this ruin?
I'm not American, if I was I would have voted for Stein though.