RobotToaster

It sure is nice of the US government to compile a list of sources for us https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/2024%20Review%20of%20Notorious%20Markets%20of%20Counterfeiting%20and%20Piracy%20(final).pdf

There's a study on it here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10691350/

And here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266651822100022X

An article about a specific retraction of a study on mentorship: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/checkpoints/202101/the-bad-retraction

The lancet removed (although not formally retracted) an article on covid-19 in Gaza https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/06/02/political-censorship-in-academic-journals-sets-a-dangerous-new-precedent/

China has allegedly forced at least one person to retract a study about public opinion on it https://retractionwatch.com/2024/07/10/author-blames-retraction-on-chinese-censorship/

The good guys winning.

Prohibiting satire of religion is a form of blasphemy law, and blasphemy laws shouldn't exist.

And?

It's supposed to preserve them, retraction is sometimes used as a form of censorship. It's a feature not a bug.

Used to edc a mju ii, the lack of zoom was limiting though.

It's also possible that the men were self medicating instead of seeking help for underlying conditions.

I read "Notorious Donald Trump" as if he had a new rap name.

Also this seems confusing, I'm on multiple SCA with my CMHT, one of which is for ADHD, are they including those? If so it's going to create a lot of pissed off NHS psychiatrists.

Of course they're singling out ADHD.

SCA are used for lots of drugs, but they go for the easy target.

No word on if it was at least green at the time.

A solution to this was invented in the soviet union, phage therapy. The FDA doesn't like it because it doesn't fit their regulatory framework, and it's not profitable, so it's not used.