Rhaedas

joined 2 years ago
[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Word usage changes over time, often not retaining its original meaning, as the article points out. I find it more interesting how the European use is more broad, where Americans separate the individual recreation from work or school into the term vacation.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The sell of the paper is a new fuel storage medium. The positive part is that creating a fuel from existing carbon sources means (hopefully) less petroleum pumped out of the ground to contribute more carbon. The negative is that it leans more to that than the permanent sequestering, and I can't seem to pick out a net energy use anywhere, but basic physics tells us it will take more energy to do the process in entirety, even if most of it results in large scale storage. I doubt that happens because removal of carbon vs. putting into a new form to be used is like burying money. Which leads to something I've noticed pop up only in the past month or so...a new term added. "Carbon capture, utililization, and storage". CCS has already been very heavily into the production of carbon products to support their efforts, after all they have to make a profit, right? The only real storage done is a product to inject into the ground to help retrieve more oil. Again, they aren't going to just bury the money, that's foolhardy for a business.

Sorry for more negativity in the thread. Just calling a spade a spade. Those who don't like the feeling that gives can just ignore it and focus on the new science that will save us.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's complicated. The breakdown of methane in the atmosphere depends on hydroxyl radicals that are created at a regular rate. If you have more and more methane released, and/or you have other chemicals that also react with those radicals, the overall average half life will increase. Both those things are happening, so the old half life really isn't as accurate as it used to be. Guess which number the IPCC still uses for its models though.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The best part is that you don't dare question what you do get, or you receive the "well, at least it's something". Yeah, I guess so, but if the intent is to make the employee feel valued it's not working very well. I do have to say that a baked potato is still better than some things I've seen posted before.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

The funny thing is that even though there are people on both sides dead set they are right, if they hear someone say the opposite pronunciation they still understand what the speaker is referring to. So there's absolutely no context lost, it's just preference, and I have a feeling given the age of the name GIF those preferences are very regional, as the internet had not become a national/international thing yet.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago

My response is simply that I'm glad they still believe in an overseer that restricts their dangerous behavior. Some of us don't need that to be nice to others.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You're right that the subjects don't have equal weights in reality. But at the time of Godwin's Law becoming a thing, the idea of fascism being an okay thing seemed about as ridiculous in the general public eye. We as a society do seem to forget the lessons from the past, or maybe some things hide and give the appearance of being gone.

In the U.S. I blame the underlying racism and "heritage" of the southern states (that spread to other states) which never really disappeared thanks to the fumbling of the Civil War resolution, but lay waiting for decades for new opportunities. It's no wonder that neo-Confederatism and neo-nazi seem to be found in similar places, ironically often wrapped in an American flag.

Complacence is part of the problem. There's a great 1943 video called "Don't Be a Sucker" that unfortunately is still timely in its message.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

to be published in a limited gold embossed leather bound volume with 500 pages of commentary, March 2024

Tolkien fanatics: "Link?"

Also...link?

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I always took Godwin's use of Hitler/Nazis as one of many final limits of arguments that the "losing" side would reach for in order to save their claim when they could not find rational reasons to support it anymore. Nazis, aliens, Deep State, etc. It's a mental flailing of absurdities to save face, and once there the point of debate is lost.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Save Southern Heritage Florida

Not all heritages are best to save. What would General Lee himself say both about trying to glorify that past as well as having statues to the losing side? I'll bet supporters either don't know, or aren't honest enough to admit they do know.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

They didn’t create the first MP3 player, but they created the first massively commercially successful one.

Going back to what others have mentioned about Apple, the iPod's success was a big part because of the intuitive interface. If it's easy to learn and use, it will become popular.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

Recycled water isn't directly toilet water, so the title is misleading to bias the react and get the click. Isn't much of urban water already recycled to some degree? And in reality, all water is "second hand" and has been somewhere else in its history on this planet. It's only a question of it being processed naturally or otherwise to be potable to drink.

Let's focus on the chemicals we've put into the world's water that can't easily (or at all) be filtered out. Toilet water is not the problem.

view more: ‹ prev next ›