Resonosity

joined 2 years ago
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

They did have quality in the early 2000s, remember my grandma taking us their for their awesome bread. Sad to see it enshittify

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Sync has been my alternative coming from RiF. Very clean experience

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Same thing with Brussels sprouts. Don't boil. Toss in salt, pepper, olive oil, and balsamic vinegar, bake at like 425 for 20 minutes, you're welcome

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. All species need to scavenge for their own subsistence unless they want to die, so there is a motivation there to go out and get food (i.e. other species), among other resources from the environment specific to their capabilities.

There is no free lunch.

BUT species don't necessarily have to exchange resources with others to live in their habitat. They might need to defend it from other organisms of their same species or of other species, or they can share it with those. Exchange relationships can also arise, but they aren't necessary to happen.

Habitat can of course degrade over time, so there is a motivation to maintain and repair that habitat or move to a more suitable one nearby or far away.

This is all to say that humans, the exceptional beings we are at solving problems and doing amazing things, should be able to invent ways to get around entropy and inconvenience, which we have to a degree: not perfectly, though.

Regarding this article, I'm not sure I want people to own land for the sake of "owning". Perhaps a case can be made where people who use the land apportioned to them get to keep it over time (see what the Nordic countries are doing). This would exclude land and homes people have in other states or countries.

Not sure what the other consequences of this practice are tho, so I welcome any feedback anyone might have

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right, because voting doesn't matter. Got it.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What was the voting age at the time of that election in Gaza? I've heard that the average age of Palestinians is 18, although that might only be a recent statistic. If the voting age of that population is so young, you might imagine the ignorance that population would have towards issues, or the potential that population might have for manipulation.

Did that 2007 election take place like US ones, where only like 2/3rds of people even vote at all?

Questions like this really make you wonder if it was even possible for the election results that put Hamas into power to be representative of the general population.

So, all of this is to say that I agree with you.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Rotate monthly tips! Or only tip your favorite

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

You keep saying that you were a proponent of FF back in the day, but the fact that you aren't giving credence to the experiences that made you switch lessens your credibility and weakens any persuasion power you might have on people switching from FF to Brave.

It would help your cause to explain what made you switch so others might understand you.

But from your demeanor, it seems like you dgaf about other people. So I guess that's fair.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah, Nebula is an alternative that's trying to grow. Think it's creator owned too which is nice. I haven't made the switch yet, but if I wanted to support creators directly I'd choose Nebula over YouTube. And if I could, I'd send money straight to them via Patreon or PayPal or other.

view more: ‹ prev next ›