Sagt der Artikel nicht das tausende in freiher Wildbahn leben, Nachkommen der ausgebrochenen Tiere?
Außerdem mehr als 4, der Fall vor 100 Jahren ist ein unspezifizierter Plural.
Früher, vor fast hundert Jahren, ist allerdings Sikawild aus einem Gatter am Möhnesee ausgebrochen – das war der Grundstein für die heute so große Population
Warum nicht sterilisieren und ihr restliches Leben leben lassen? Selbst wenn sie ausbrechen kann ja dann nichts schlimmes mehr passieren.
If you measure response curves of individual cones and rods you won't see any of the parameters go below the ms range, probably not even below 10ms. However the retina does receive bright short pulses as longer averaged signals. All the very high Hz vision cases see information of the same "object" spread over many cells in the retina. A trail showing up as many distinct images vs a long smear.
If you couldn't move your eyes the limit would be lower, but because you can't the rendering cannot anticipate those effects and emulate them. Motion blur is what happens when you always "anticipate" the eye to remain static. If you could measure eye movement extremely well and react within well under a ms, you might be able to match motion blur to eye movement of a single person. Add a second observer and it already breaks down. Not that our sensors are anywhere remotely near making this possible.
Edit: I suppose this would mean if you integrated a display into contact lenses and got the latency right you would max out at lower Hz.
Shouldn't be enums as refresh rates can be floating-point and in practice there also is a lot of weirdness out there, like 59.94Hz.
The timing really needs to be matched to the monitor, you don't want a 60Hz monitor using the resources of a 1000Hz monitor at any point. It should also be handled by the gpu and gpu driver more than the os.
I don't think it's that easy and I struggle to think of a legitimate reason. To me it seems more like an arbitrary bounds-check on monitor info received via hdmi/displayport. Bad coding for sure, but also potentially a point where people are pushed to newer more problematic versions of windows as the older ones "don't support new hardware".
Why was this ever a hardcoded limitation?
It really isn't. There's a whole lengthy explanation of it here but tldw motion breaks it. Lower refresh rates leave single images instead of smooth trails, while if you track motion then slower refreshrates make stuff blurry while in motion.
I don't think the video mentions it, but you could flicker the backlight to make tracked motion smooth, but then eye movements will see many individual images end up on your retina instead of motionblur.
If you wanna wiggle you mouse at high speeds while maintaining image quality, say for fps 180 noscopes, then you will easily see improvements into the 10s of kHz.
I would say if a country wants to swallow a group of people, they should add their language to the official languages.
There are sufficient examples of nations with multiple official languages, like Belgium and Switzerland each having 3.
Apply this backwards in time too and it solves the issues.
Don't wanna add a random language to your state? Don't annex stuff.
fact is:
The US dollar index, which tracks the greenback against a basket of six major currencies, has risen by just under 3% since the end of last month. The dollar’s surge against the euro has been especially emphatic, at just below 3.5%.
us media claimed:
The dollar’s strength is largely being “driven by demand for so-called safe-haven assets”, the Wall Street Journal said. Reuters was even more emphatic: “Dollar reclaims safe-haven mantle,” read one headline, among many similar ones.
brussels thinktank instead points out:
The US, a major oil and gas producer, has seen its currency surge as its export prices have risen, driven by the war’s negative impact on the world’s energy supply. Europe, conversely, is a net importer of fossil fuels, pushing the euro lower.
Most damaging for the ‘safe haven’ narrative is, however, the fact that US Treasury yields have actually risen since the start of the war. This is the exact opposite of what a genuine flight to safety would produce, as stronger demand for US debt would push Treasury prices up and yields down.
Schwer zu lesen aber glaube das heißt "nein".
we're still enjoying each other's friendship and love.
look at ven diagram
it's complicated
!unexpectedfactorial@sopuli.xyz
I'd expect any current displayport port to handle very high refreshrates when the resolution is reduced correspondingly. The limit to my knowledge is in bitrate.
I'd also expect connector support to sit in the gpu driver.
A basic sanity-check might be the answer though. Still why not improve it instead of just increasing the number? You could check if the rate is an outlier or there are many profiles offered that climb up to that rate for example.