Redjard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry I was just continuing the bit, I haven't actually done that.
Simply took @nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 's statement and rewrote it to fit the style of the post titles in the screenshot, by ~~sexbot chat hole program~~ hand.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I started writing custom resumes with ai and got way more interviews within 4 months

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 5 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Thx, that looks completely different yeah. Given that even the neck folds are changed I suppose it's an ai edit.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 13 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

Do you have the original?

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lots of huts probably have an ac or heater. This could all be the same device, at which point it'd definitely be easier than running the pipes for water and maintaining pumps and a dedicated tank.
Don't see a reason you couldn't have a simple ac window unit that also has a warm water port, which you plug a single cable into going straight to your pannels on the roof.

Edit: And once batteries are more affordable (or if you have a few grand to burn) you can then plug in a battery pack conveniently on the indoors side of your window unit.
The indoors side can just have a few regular outlets you can extension cord around to where you need them.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Modern solar into a modern heat pump is gonna be more efficient than heating water. It's also more versatile and convenient, cause it maintains that efficiency when you pull power from the grid at night. And of course lets you use the power for other purposes.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Edit Edit: Yeah you are definitely right, it doesn't show the updated votes, the order doesn't change. I was probably seeing new posts mixed in.

Edit: Actually you may be right, I'll have to wait some more for testing.

That sounds odd. The cases I saw definitely had updated scores. I usually read all 400+ ones yet they clearly have new ones that reached 400 since I read.
And restarting the app changes the sort order compared to before, while the votes stay the same.

The vote numbers may be getting fetched in the way the app updates old info when feeds have been open for a while, but the sort order is definitely wrong.

Pulldown refresh and exiting and reopening the feed both don't fix it.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I think I have reproduced it on dbzer0. Two posts incorrectly sorted right after a refresh, on top-daily sort.

I the process I changed vote display to show score, which seems broken on compact mode.
Right after toggling the setting it looked like this to me:

After a restart it just showed both votes separately anyway, seemingly ignoring the setting. That's why the screenshot above uses a different layout.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago

I'll start a test on dbzer0 but it'll take a while for the sort to change

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago (7 children)

On all (and presumably other subs) The app seems to never update the sort order.

Wait a few hours and a sort by top looks like this:

Even closing and reopening doesn't affect it (including applying the hide read posts).
Changing instances or quitting the app does make it fetch the new order.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 10 points 3 days ago

In serious, most ways to loose blood and need blood infusions will loose the plastics too, so the donated blood just maintains the concentrations, the samw way it does for the other components.
Everyone has plastics in their blood.

But then if you donate frequently your blood will have lower concentrations due to all the previous donations, so don't just donate, donate often.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

Updated 79.5 to 80.5 with no change, issue persists.

 

I think the rules require me to censor the one-who-was-not-known too.

view more: next ›