Redcat

joined 2 years ago
[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

discusses NATO's wars

actually, where have i said anything about NATO?

so you didn't connect the dots when they talk about the international community or the coalition of the willing?

thats why people don't care to be civil to supporters. that and the odds they live in one the countries being attacked.

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why would I have a positive opinion of yanks in the future?

Why ask about the future, when it's a mystery in the present as well. You're the one who thinks they'll pay reparations for something they think you deserved.

You weren't supposed to buy cheap resources from Russia. You never had the permission to.

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be fair, the democrats were absolutely bloodthirsty when Obama was elected warlord and he waged war against the peoples of Syria and Libya. It's a bipartisan problem affecting both liberal parties.

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

I'm currently serving in the US military and am very confident that Western media at large is on the money

'thank you for your service', you say when someone describes their career pushing paper in the afghani legation quarter

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

its only gladio if its from the european region of the international community. in south america its merely a sparkling condor.

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

NATO's proxy war was against the people of eastern ukraine and crimea. They also had their backers.

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

But realistically speaking the US would probably willingly pay damages and reparations.

michael-laugh you really do live in an alternative reality. This is the most insane thing you've written in this entire conversation. And even so:

Materially or in some diplomatic quid pro quo manner and all of that is going to happen behind closed doors and we'll know once records get unsealed.

It's just a cover for how reality slowly sets in. You went from believing that the US would never attack Germany to saying that, actually, the US would totally pay reparations for bombing Nordstream. They'd just do it behind closed doors in order to save face.

You'll get nothing, and you'll be happy to pay all the damages yourself, my friend. And once the records are unsealed you'll be in your 60s, swearing up and down that such skullduggery from the Americans are in the past.

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

person posts about the civility of people complaining about NATO led mass murders

you can't just conclude they care more about civility than NATO's warmongering

thats a very lemmy.midwest thing to say

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

As a third party can see, the risk to the Americans really was zero. Everything to gain, nothing to possibly lose. What, are the Germans gonna rebel somehow? They'll fall over themselves to pretend the chains aren't even there.

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (7 children)

You say that like your know their level of concern or activity in regards to those.

it's self evident, given the issues they raise

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

What they meant is that Ireland is viciously seeking to invade UK land with it's 'reunification' idea.

[–] Redcat@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

it was the standard foreign aid the US throws around to advance it's interests.

It's quite telling that the US has triggered so many coups around the world that you can call it 'the standard foreign aid'. How the hell do you think coups come about?

view more: ‹ prev next ›