ReadMoreBooks

They could avoid taxes on the proceeds with the deal of the art.

They're thinking about demanding that billionaire-owned media outlets tell us what's going on.

Instead, I suggest we start buying more guns and killing more CEOs.

How is this made?

Drill, jigsaw, trim router, and then the tight corners by hand with a chisel and sandpaper?

I read this then looked at it again. Now I kinda like it. The choices make much more sense. I've never experienced such a rapid shift in aesthetic preferences before. I don't know what else to say except, Thank You.

After decades engaging theory and praxis, after a half dozen books on the specific topic, after suggesting the core text on the topic to you, I now need to watch some fuckhead's video to explain the basics?

I'm not convinced. Not even a little bit.

Looking forward to your explanation of which leftist organization organized this event and how streaming video facilitates operational security.

Every action has a level of risk. Doing nothing is not acceptable.

<ModeratorHat>

I see you.

</ModeratorHat>

Given all the evidence, it would be extremely unwise to attend this event.

The fact that you felt the need to speak as a moderator instead of defeating my claims with the facts and reason you should've had before you supported it should serve as a red flag to for yourself and others.

Do NOT attend this event.

No one can identify the organizers. It's being held without the involvement of any group of organized leftists.

The guidance posted in this thread recommends streaming of video evidence and propagation of that video. This is a blatant violation of operational security.

Revolutionary events are never shared with major media outlets. Major media outlets would not propagate them.

Do NOT attend this event. You WILL be identified by your oppressors. It WILL become a threat to your security. We CANNOT save you from the consequences.

Do NOT attend this event.

I'd say I'm an artist. But, not in a traditional sense. I see that many others said about what I said. And, I don't want you be discouraged.

When I'm creating something it's rarely very original. Others have already figured out how to "speak" to others with their art. My art is usually a copy of another's idea that I'd tweaked. Or it's an amalgamation of several ideas that I thought would work well together.

But, sometimes the point of creation isn't to speak to others. Or, perhaps I'm not saying what they'd like to hear. I think this is what's happened here. No one faults your workmanship. They're just recognizing that you weren't thinking about them when you created it while also finding no fault with that choice.

I encourage you to create and share again. This time, make a very conscious choice of who is your audience. Attach no guilt to a hypothetical choice to speak a language very few will understand.

I don't actually hate it. I love it because it's difficult thing to make, you had the courage to share it, and you asked me why.

I don't like how the accents have little contrast. And, the waves are irregular but don't seem to follow a natural edge. It doesn't "speak" to me in a way I can easily understand.