Randomgal

joined 2 years ago
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Gearing up? El Salvador is taking them in already.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

IDK anymore man. 2 years go I would have said of course not. But the US is proving kings are back in vogue, so I wouldn't take republicanism for granted.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)
  • Dad can I have Snapchat?
  • But we have Snapchat at home!

This is you rn. She wants to keep up with her friends, not participate in your ideology.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Lmao that's exactly what I came here to say. Do th se guys get their worldvied from Hollywood movies or something?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 months ago

Lol why don't you touch some grass?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Lmao. "hit get another job bro, easy." I see, my bad. I thought I a was speaking to a grown up lol.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The key piece of information is the treaties. Long story short: The treaties a were signed with "the Crown", the absolute power of Canada that still exists (it's just no longer controlled by the actual Kng but by the government) with the sovereign first nations.

This is a small distinction but it makes all the difference. The treaties supercede any other Canadian legislation because they are signed with the Crown itself, the representation of the full abstract authority of the government, so they outweigh (at least in theory) any other law that came after.

The chiefs are calling the King as a power move, they are reminding him and the Canadian bureaucrsts "your ancestors and descendants are bound by this deal, the power you represent is bound by this deal, it is not a negotiation"

Imagine pulling an email with the CEO while talking to a manager, this is what they are doing.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

You're giving them too much credit. Elon doesnt care, zombies make his brain go brrrrr so he roleplays. That's it.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

You are giving a perfect example of what I'm saying. Zero of your information is useful or applicable and you insist that "just do it bro" is the answer.

You apparently don't even know unions work differently depending on the country, and yet you "educated" me as if you were giving me the secret to catgirls.

This is exactly my point. There is a disconnect between the ideologues and those privileged enough to be able to join an existing union, and the reality of the majority of workers that can't simply "just join a union or make your own" like its ordering a meal of Uber eats.

Unions are a privilege, and we should stop acting like it's something anyone can "just get one bro".

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It's really easy to say things like this in the comfort of your home.

I don't expect anyone to choose removing bread from their family's table to "do the right thing", punishing people at the bottom playing into the oligarchs game of divide and conquer.

You don't shoot the hostage to kill the kidnapper.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

They have an opinion on losing money, they're afraid they might end up being sued.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean sure. It's also okay to want a partner that cares about your experience during intimate, vulnerable acts instead of a guy who sees you as just a useful hole

view more: ‹ prev next ›