RamrodBaguette

By ground level, I mean games where the scope is of people on the ground (either an individual PC or party) rather than playing as an abstract nation or political party like in a grand strategy game. So nothing Paradox- or Kremlingames-related (though, Victoria 3 including little things like pop info is a nice touch).

At first, Fallout 4 seemed to fit the bill with its settlement system but it's still very much within the bounds of capitalism and private property no matter how much I like to think the Minutemen are actually communalists or whatever.

Also admitting that you’d side against WWII partisans who killed German settlers (as had happened in the Zamość uprising among many other instances) as well as ANC-associated militias who attacked Apartheid government workers and Boer “farmers” is not having you beat the Hitlerite allegations any time soon.

Especially funny when you go down his own thread and see him bend over backwards to try to defend himself, like saying Ukrainians can have their own October 7th as a treat because it’s “proportionate”.

Game starts in 1337 instead of 1444

Pre-Aztec Mexico

This is the post these comments are on lmao. Really is just making an algorithm that spams every pro-Palestine post with the word Gaza with this dumb response.

👀

For the first time, I know what it's like to get an Atlus game (albeit on sale) only for the updated re-release to be announced not too long after

Evergreen.

“It shows”

“There is no evidence of Israel doing that”

I can’t help but wonder if he deep down understands what he’s saying is a load of crap and if he’s aware that he’s just running damage control for Western Liberalism and this rotten world order it’s built for for its own sake. People will be fooled if they want to be fooled, and liberals who want to pretend that their ideology isn’t sustained by the blood of thousands of children in the global periphery will grasp at anything, no matter how weak. Especially true for streamer grift artists whose personal brand depends on it (something something “you can’t convince someone if their paycheck depends on their ignorance)

There’a no link since I just grabbed this screen, but it looks like he deleted/hid it lol

Damn, I wonder why there's such a large overlap between "tough on crime" right-wingers who like to talk shit about a city they think the [redacted]s ruined and people who support what the IDF is doing. Sure is a mystery. Also, taking bets before how long they try to include Johnson as one of their targets in the latest DEI outrage grift.

Here's a link to the BT news post about it

Link.

Artist also made a template for other characters lmao

I've been debating to myself whether or not voting for a third party candidate (Either PSL's de la Cruz or Green's West, regardless of my criticisms for both) would be the most "effective" use of my time in election season this year. The argument for "not" is that maybe voting at all is bad because it legitimizes this system, even if a third party candidate getting a record turnout would grab more attention (and piss off Blue MAGA cultists) than simply not going since it's not like abysmal turnouts, even by this country's historical standards, are newsworthy at this point. So I guess I have to ask how you people rationalize voting or not this year?

I fully understand that this is more symbolic than anything else and won't materially affect change for a while but it's still something to think about.