Quik

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Quik 18 points 1 year ago

It is, a gaming focused Fedora distro to be exact.

[–] Quik 2 points 2 years ago

I think you might mean "post hoc…" which is a more specific case of "cum hoc…" and sets focus on time/order of events

[–] Quik 16 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Half joking, a tone indicator like /s

A list: https://toneindicators.carrd.co/#masterlist

[–] Quik 1 points 2 years ago

The "problem" here (if you think so) is that if law enforcement in Germany gets to know about a case like this, they cannot choose themselves not to act on it.

[–] Quik 46 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would suspect because there is probably space for errors in the detection system

[–] Quik 2 points 2 years ago

You’re right, as far as I know we have not yet implemented systems to actively reduce similarity to specific works in the training data past a certain point, but if we chose to do so in the future this would raise the question of formalising when plagiarism starts; which I suspect to be challenging in the near future, as society seems to not yet have a uniform opinion on the matter.

[–] Quik 2 points 2 years ago

Interesting take on LLMs, how are you so sure about that?

I mean I get it, current image gen models seem clearly uncreative, but at least the unrestricted versions of Bing Chat/ChatGPT leave some room for the possibility of creativity/general intelligence in future sufficiently large LLMs, at least to me.

So the question (again: to me) is not only "will LLM scale to (human level) general intelligence", but also "will we find something better than RLHF/LLMs/etc. before?".

I’m not sure on either, but asses roughly a 2/3 probability to the first and given the first event and AGI in reach in the next 8 years a comparatively small chance for the second event.

[–] Quik 2 points 2 years ago

Firefox (idk about other browsers) also has a feature where you can right click the element on the website and directly make a screenshot just of this element, that should work as well.

[–] Quik 0 points 2 years ago

Why all those downvotes? What did I miss?

[–] Quik 2 points 2 years ago

Something about that just feels… kinda great, definitely sounds like something one should strive for.

[–] Quik 1 points 2 years ago

But wouldn’t pig be pi*g?

[–] Quik 1 points 2 years ago

Children will (on average) be a net-positive/taxed in the future, therefore societies incentivize having children by letting parents pay less taxes. Also, children will completely form the society of the future, so different groups in a society having children is probably a good idea for a more diverse society in the future. As having children is expensive it is probably a good idea to let less wealthier people also have children, as you probably don’t want to just exclude them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›