It's porn.
It's always porn that decides if a technology lives or dies.
It's porn.
It's always porn that decides if a technology lives or dies.
The logo needs work. I read that as Syncoin and had a repulse reaction.
To me it was somewhere in the late 90's, but I'm sure people will still be debating this when I die.
This leads to the question of where I can find rule 34 of this.
Each new technology immediately raises two questions: how do we destroy it and how do we use it for destruction.
The year of Linux Desktop is here!
Maybe its because Cameron is not one of my favorite directors. I love T2, of course but I can't say the same about Titanic because (you guessed it) I still have not watched it and also didn't buy into the hype when it was released. I remember that movie theaters were booked solid for weeks and you couldn't get a ticket. No movie is that good or justifies that kind of hype, so I have skipped it so far.
It is sad to see the mental gymnastics people do to justify their inertia.
"It's opt-in!"
"You can disable feature X easily by editing the registry"
"You can install this tool from a shifty site to restore that feature MS disabled"
Am I the only one here that has never seen it or understands what the hype is about?
I can live with that.
Somehow I'm pretty sure Google already had that information. You've never used Google Wallet to pay on the go? No? How about your Android keyboard to fill in some banking form?
850 hours on Skyrim and counting.
I seem to have it under control now.