Sounds the same as believing a random stranger.
How many SO topics have you seen with only one, universally agreed upon solution?
QHC
joined 2 years ago
If you want a one stop shop to get all the necessary information in an efficient time then megathreads are great.
Strong disagree. My experience with megathreads is primarily being full of memes and puns, with so many hundreds of root comments that even using extra tools it was impossible to follow any real conversation or updates.
It's also good at stopping a specific type of content from taking over a forum...
That is the only thing megathreads accomplish, IMO.
There is already a system for users to provide feedback on what articles they do or don't want to see.
I agree with others that the concept of "mega threads" are fundamentally broken and not something I'm interested in carrying over from Reddit.
This is a place for discussion where users vote to decide what rises or stays obscure. Let the system work how it is designed. If there are too many posts about a particular topic, it's either extremely relevant at the time or there are other moderation rules that could be considered to make sure low-effort posts are not dominating more substantial posts.
Is it better than a light rail system, or would that not help sell enough products from a company owned by Musk?
Sometimes one or the other has a recent updates that causes problems, or a random movie won't play right. It's rare, but since both connect to the same NAS where all of my media is stored, running both is pretty easy and it's nice to have a backup.
What are you talking about? "Innocent until proven guilty" is only relevant from the perspective of the law.
How is that practically different from a user perspective than answers on SO? Either way, I still have to try the suggested solutions to see if they work in my particular situation.
All cops are murdering bastards, or at best willing accomplices, so yeah, that makes perfect sense to me.
I work for a marketing agency which has a mix of typical office roles (accounting, HR, sales) and industry specific positions (mostly creatives and developers). The former are normally used to Windows from previous jobs or school, and the exact opposite is true of the creative departments. So, choosing which platform each new hire prefers is standard for us (and has been for more than a decade).
Only the nerds in Silicon Valley could come up with a technical solution to such massive problems as income inequality. How can supposedly intelligent people spend more than 1 second thinking that makes any sense?
What's next, are we going to make an app to answer vexing questions like "why does evil exist"?!
My understanding is that Grusch has not actually claimed to have first-hand evidence of anything he claims. He is relying on some other source telling him they've seen crazy shit, essentially.