PugEnjoyer

I'm all for reexamining how we use our time and I'm definitely trying to get myself off always looking St my phone when I'm not doing anything.

But why does that mean buying a new product? You can change your behavior by just not looking at those things. And when you do legitimately need to have your phone to check something, you can develop the discipline to do that one thing and then put it away. Just seems like the obvious move.

Same issue, pomade was the fix for me (wavy hair), until then I always just lived with my hair looking like shit until it reached the perfect balance of "unwashed enough to have some weight and texture on it, clean or dry shampooed enough to not look super unwashed".

I swear someone needs to teach young men about pomade, hair gel, mousse, just anything at all about how to style and texture your hair. I guarantee the guy in the left pic doesn't look like that when he rolls out of bed, and if you want your hair to look like his, you'll need similar amounts of styling and product.

He already wiggled out of this one. He said Ukraine shouldn't start a war it can't win and expect to buy missiles to make up for it. His base accepted this explanation despite it making no sense, his opposition was mad but couldn't stop this decision and so everyone just moved on once it happened.

We're not talking about an AI running a nuclear reactor, this article is about AI assistants on a personal phone. 0.001% failure rates for apps on your phone isn't that insane, and generally the only consequence of those failures would be you need to try a slightly different query. Tools like Alexa or Siri mishear user commands probably more than 0.001% of the time, and yet those tools have absolutely caught on for a significant amount of people.

The issue is that the failure rate of AI is high enough that you have to vet the outputs which typically requires about as much work as doing whatever you wanted the AI to do yourself, and using AI for creative things like art or videos is a fun novelty, but isn't something that you're doing regularly and so your phone trying to promote apps that you only want to use once in a blue moon is annoying. If AI were actually so useful you could query it with anything and 99.999% of the time get back exactly what you wanted, AI would absolutely become much more useful.

Fucking garbage tier party, will stick up for literally nobody, only procedural norms. They won't fight for trans, abortion, migrants, or any other rights, and God forbid you ask them to at least not vote for their opponent's department nominations, that'd make things so awkward in Congress!

Fucking useless "opposition"

Thanks you Trump for finally eliminating US soft power. Once no nation sees any benefits in close relationships with the US and actively hates it, the US will truly be a wealthier and more powerful super power than ever before!

(I'm being sarcastic, jfc this is so stupid and cruel)

Honestly that's totally fair and I can see how an AI therapist could help more than a human one. I personally have wanted to have a regular therapist for a number of years, and I had one that really helped me when I was first figuring out I'm trans, but then I moved and now whenever I try to look for therapists, it feels like I can't find anyone that gives me those right mix of "LGBT literate", "(Polish) immigrant literate", "autism and ADHD literate" and on top of those, being able to figure out if I can vibe with them AND won't "queer broken arm syndrome" me, and I've basically given up looking. A lot of my progress in mental health development lately have been just really reflecting about the ways of thinking I'm stuck in that maybe are hindering me, but that's largely worked for me because (despite the state of the world) I've had a period of good stability and a wife to bounce thoughts off of.

Thank you for sharing your experience, I can definitely relate to those kinds of struggles and understand how having a tool that just gives you other perspectives generated from a composition of average people's posts would be useful unto itself! I guess I get really knee jerk about AI because I've seen so many projects that do treat the AI tools we have now as "actual literal synthetic sentient intelligence or something damn close" when it's nowhere near that. Your use of it is actually a perfect understanding of what it does now, what it can give you, and how to make use of it, and I should be more careful in how I talk about AI when there are people who do gain genuine use from it.

Thank you again for sharing your perspective!

The clergy and worshippers said they enjoyed it, but agreed it wouldn’t replace services led by humans anytime soon.

“It was pretty entertaining and fun, but it didn’t feel like a Mass or a service. … It felt distant. I didn’t feel like they were talking to me,” Taru Nieminen told The Associated Press.

The Rev. Kari Kanala, the vicar at St. Paul’s, echoed her sentiment.

“The warmth of the people is what people need,” he said.

I mean, isn't that basically how every AI project goes? "It's a fun novelty, but actually expecting anything deeper from it always gives you a hollow experience"? Maybe we don't need to try doing everything with AI, maybe we can just assume it'll be the case and move on

It's wild how "take seriously" just means "stop pretending that his ramblings are seventh dimensional chess". Sometimes, the emperor really is just wearing no clothes!