PseudoSpock

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wait what? I'm no fan of Wayland, but what you just said, I'm afraid, is all wrong.

  1. Wayland, although being around for over a decade, is the newer protocol. The older protocol would be X11.
  2. Pipewire is also the new kid on the block, for audio. PulseAudio would be the older one being replaced.
  3. WINE is a Windows compatibility layer or wedge. It stands for Wine Is Not an Emulator, if I recall.

Wayland seeks to provide a newer display standard, as I keep being told (forcefully and repeatedly) X11 is not sustainable... There's a lot about that we don't need to rehash here, but long story short, In with the new (Wayland), and sooner or later, out with the old (X11).

Pipewire is meant to be a replacement for PulseAudio, and near as I can tell, quite backwards compatible.

WINE is to run Windows application on Linux. Like many Linux applications right now, it is being updated to support Wayland (I believe that's well underway already) and it already works fine with Pipewire. WINE will work on X11 and Wayland.

Lastly, what do you mean by weaker systems? X11 is weak when it comes to being security conscious. Part of Wayland's mission is to address that by being far more secure by default. Pipewire, while maintaining backwards compatibility, is able to do more things, as well, than the original PulseAudio.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Record it happening so you have evidence to back it up. Get it onto social media so everyone can help report it, too!

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago

I'm sorry, I found your response confusing. Arch is a Linux distro, I know flatpak is available for it. If there's a bug with flatpak, I would expect it to be pretty much the same across most GNU based Linux systems. My question, however, was why use flatpak on Arch Linux at all, as the AUR has pretty much everything including the kitchen sink... unless you are developing flatpaks, I guess, in which then it would make sense to me.

You don't owe me an explanation, it just sounded odd to me to be needing flatpak when there was AUR, was all.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Flatpak on Arch? Is what you want not in the AUR?

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

RDP is not a replacement for individual remote apps, btw, just saying. RDP is a full remote desktop, like VNC.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like an act of civil war. Spank them... spank them hard, daddy.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Kernel 0.99pl13, Slackware, 386-SX 16. Started as an obsessive hobby, became a career.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 years ago

Pics or it didn't happen.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Snaps pushed me to mint on one and endeavour on the other box.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Ext4 just went through a data loss fix in the kernel, too.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

I'm Tom Dudette, and I'll leave the light on for ya. (guitar outro...)

view more: ‹ prev next ›