In the example before that, she reported bad behavior to the event organizer, who did basically nothing.
Some people don't want to have to risk their careers in order to enact change. When women speak up, they have a legitimate risk of being labeled as difficult or profiteering The author's hope is that men don't face the same level of criticism or skepticism when calling out other men, and that more voices will make women safer and this whole endeavor more productive.
The suffragettes were repeatedly arrested, they were branded terrorists. Later, their hunger strikes while in prison were broken with force feeding via stomach pump.
Suffragettes also bombed buildings and committed arson and vandalism, even if their means were effective, maybe we shouldn't advocate for their strategies.
I can see it being a great stylistic choice given the context. AI is able to nail the lowest point of the uncanny valley, and that makes a lot of sense for the shapeshifting stuff going on in this series.
But from a broader social choice, I think it's in bad taste. I personally think that AI art is copyright infringement on a massive scale. It rubs a lot of artists and people invested in art in the wrong way.