Prunebutt

joined 2 years ago
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Kidnapping children and suppression of their language IS genocide.

I don't think it's as clear cut as e.g. the charter schools in the so-called US. These kids were in a warzone and I'd rather see them in Russian schools than casualties lying in some mass grave. It's still fucking horrible, but I still see the difference in magnitude.

The Russian state has, on multiple occasions over the years, denied the existence of Ukraine and Ukrainians as a distinct group with a right to exist.

Nope. Putin claimed that Russians, Ukrainians and Belarussians are "one people". That's not "denying the right of existence". Danes, Norwegians, Swedes, Icelanders and Fins always call themselves "the Northerners" without wanting to annex each other.

You have an agenda and you will only see what you want to see.

Well, I could accuse you of the same.

You want to support imperial genocide? You go right ahead.

Now where did you get the idea that I support what Russia is doing? In the first comment you replied to I clearly stated that I condoned neither Russia nor Ukraine.

My stance is that the territorial interests of Ukraine aren't worth all the Ukrainians that are still sent into the meatgrinder.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

Wouldn't you know it: I already checked. Wanna know what stories I found? Slaughter of civilians? Yes. War crimes? Sure. Kidnapping of children in Ukraine? You bet. Full-blown genocide?

... umm, sorry to say that, but I kinda didn't find anything that convinced me that Russia wants to exterminate the Ukrainian people and their culture. There's a magnitude of scale between bombing civilians and direct measures to eradicate a people.

Personally, I don't really think it matters on a personal level if I'm killed by Russian bombs because they shell civilian infrastructure or if I'm killed on the battlefield because the Ukrainian government drafted me (against my will) and they didn't want to give up control over Crimea, Donbasz and Donetsk.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (8 children)

So? I haven't come across any of those "multiple, indepentent sources". Care to share some of them? I'm genuinely curious. I'm about as happy to be convinced as one can be learning about a supposed ongoing genocide.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago (10 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 days ago (12 children)

Do you think that Russia is the only one doing propaganda?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (14 children)

That's not because they're pro Russia, but because the "far left" is anti-nationalist and both Ukraine and Russia are fighting for each their nationalist cause.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

Danke, betzt hab ich den Pokerap als Ohrwurm. =.=

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nicht, wenn es am praktischsten wäre. So viel ist schonmal klar.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In den Bergen ist's da ganz schön. Da ist man idR weit genug weg vom Söder.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Kannst den Zug nehmen, oder das Rad, oder ein Auto, oder Adler. Zu Fuß wird's schwierig.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

Ohje. Ich hab nicht die Energie, die wahnhaften Ideen eines ernsthaften Verfechters der österreichischen Schule anzulabern. Ich probier's mal. Aber wundere dich nicht, dass das nur halbärschig wird.

"Der Kapitalismus hat millionen Menschen aus der Armut befreit.... der Kommunismus Millionen verhungern lassen"

Lol. Die UdSSR und VRC haben einen dermaßenen Zuwachs an Wohlstand für ihre bäuerliche Bevölkerung erlangt, dass den marktkapitalistischen Nationen die Ohren wackeln müssten (wenn man den technologischen Fortschritt der Nationen zu Beginn des real-existierenden Sozialismus vergleicht). Und ich bezeichne diese Natonen nicht mal als Sozialistisch.

Dein Argument mit der "Natur des Menschen" basiert auf dem naturalistischen Trugschluss. Es soll ja angeblich in der "Natur des Menschen" liegen, "Wettstreit" zu betreiben. So eine Argumentation negiert den freien Willen des Menschen, sich selbst Zwecke zu setzen. Wenn es das nicht täte: was hindert uns daran, diese "Natur" nicht anders auszuleben? Abgesehen davon basiert dieses Naturbild auf einem Missverstehen von Darwin. Sozialdarwinismus wurde vor über 100 Jahren von Peter Kropotkin widerlegt. Deine Binsenweisheiten über Biologie sind von vorvorgestern.

Du verstehst zudem "die Linke" nicht. Österreicher (Ökonomen) tun sich sehr schwer damit, Hierarchien aus sozialen Verhältnissen wegzudenken und können die CNT/FAI im spanischen Bürgerkrieg nicht von Stalin unterscheiden. Die Ausbeutung ist kein moralisches Urteil, sondern ökonomischer Fakt aus der Dynamik G -> W -> G' (Marx lesen zum Verstädnis).

Dass Konkurrenz zu mehr "Reichtum" führen soll, als Kooperation ist auch nur der Fall im Gegenteilland.

Die extreme Linke erkennt nicht, dass der Mensch in erster Linie ein Individuum ist das zuerst sich, dann seine direkte Familie, dass die erweiterte Sippe und erst dann "den ganzen Rest" in die Folgenabschätzung seines Handelns aufnimmt.

Soße? Anthropologische Quellen bitte. Keine Teesatzlesungen von Ökonomen.

DAS ist die Gesellschaftsform die ich persönlich als wünschenswert erachte und die meinen persönlichen Konservatismus prägen.

Was machst du dann in dieser Community?

Ich lehne jede Form des Extremismus ab

Schon praktisch, wenn man sich nicht mit Inhalten auseinandersetzen muss, was? Die Nerven doch eh nur. /s

... bist du nicht nach eigener Aussage Marktextremist? So leicht geht es: wenn ich einfach deklariere, alles außerhalb meines selbst arbiträr festgelegten Mittelfelds kacke ist, dann kann ich alles als inhärent zu extrem und daher kacke definieren.

die Faschisten die denken es gäbe qualitative Unterschiede zwischen den "Rassen"

Wenn du wüsstest, wie viele der österreichischen Schule Eugeniker sind/waren. ^^

Wenn jemand "The Bell Curve" lobt, ist die Person schon ein Cryptofaschist, Brudi.

die Individualismus [...] ablehnen.

Wie gesagt: Keine Ahnung von linken positionen. Nur Strohmänner gelernt.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Doch, braucht man. Ich verstehe nämlich nicht ganz, was an Linksradikalismus an sich schlecht sein soll.

Kannst ja mal ein Argument draus machen.

 

Sooo müüüde =.=

Bildbeschreibung:

Bild von einem Huhn. Text am oberen Bildrand: "Huhn" Text am unteren Bildrand: "Mir gehts Huhnsmiserabel"

 

Hi!

I've daydreamed about getting a cutter plotter without actually planning on really getting one. Too expensive and shelfspace-consuming for something that I'm not going to actually use that often.

Then I remembered that I could "just" mount a dragknife on my Ender-3 pro to do the job (maybe get one of these fancy quick-toolhead-changing systems as an excuse to tinker with CANbus, or something ;).

After a bit of online search, I found that I'm hardly not the first one with that idea. I've found a few videos, posts on reddit and files on thingiverse/printables, but nothing too in-depth. So I wanted to ask y'all if you know any resources to check out on this. Some github-pages style homepage of someone would be ideal, but I'm not too hopeful that there's something out there if I haven't found it yet.

Things I think I've found out:

  • Roland Cutting Plotter Vinyl Cutters are apparently the way to go. With 45° for vinyl.
  • I can use gcodetools to create gcode from svgs. The exact details aren't clear to me, though. Probably gonna have to create a klipper macro for this.
  • I can simply attach a cutter to my toolhead, or use something like the BTT hermit crab for a more fancy approach

Things I'm still not sure how to do:

  • If I'm using a BL-Touch - how should I handle z-homing? Can Klipper use BL-Touch for z-homing with an endstop-failsafe? Should I just monitor the print by hand?
  • Is there a comprehensive guide on the materials?

Do you have any experience on that topic?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/62694782

me_irl

 

cross-posted from: https://pawb.social/post/23101304

The Rule of Law

 

Hi! I'm sometimes handling photos of people who wouldn't like their real faces shown. But pixellation isn't a very PR-friendly practice if you want to publish the images (e.g. photos of a protest).

So I remembered that ages ago, back when I used snapchat that they had this simple faceswap feature that was able to run on a simple smartphone and I was wondering:

Is there a simple, easy to set up program that takes the faces of a picture and faceswaps them with another, available face?

I was thinking of getting a random face from this-person-does-not-exist.com and superimpose it on the faces of the photo. This way, it's protecting the identity of the people on the photos, while keeping the photo easy to look at (plus, no one else's likeness will be used unconsentually).

After a quick google, I found faceswap.dev, but then I read stuff about extracting, training and converting and deemed it overkill. The feature I was thinking of was done for two people swapping their faces on a live video feed on a phone. I don't want to go broke by throwing a GTX 5090 on that problem.

Do you know any problem on Desktop (or maybe on android, or a selfhosted service) that can do that kind of thing? IMHO, it shouldn't be too hard.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.cafe/post/13998113

rule

58
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Prunebutt@slrpnk.net to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
 
 

A friend gifted me a few hellofresh boxes once and I quite liked the recipes. But I don't care about subscription services to get overpriced groceries delivered if the supermarket is a 5 minutes walk away.

Is there any collection on the recipes online? At least in Germany, recipes aren't even copyrighted, so it wouldn't even be illegal to distribute them here (AFAIK, IANAL).

view more: ‹ prev next ›