Prologue7642

joined 2 years ago
[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Probably Minecraft or LoL. But it has been a long time since I played them. Nowadays, I mainly just play indie roguelikes.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I try to be positive. Even the libs on Lemmy are still better than the average redditor.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I would be really interested if those are actual numbers. It seems like a bit too high, but shame there is basically no way to know for sure without some privacy issues.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago

This, when I first entered Lemmy just as an FOSS alternative to reddit, I also thought that those Lemmygrad people are taking things too far. Now I consider myself ML and really enjoy the community here.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I am a programmer. Started out as a machine learning scientist, but now I do more Git Ops stuff. But now I am trying to work as little as possible and focus more on FOSS projects that I can actually get passionate about.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Neovim, but I am considering switching to Helix. The one thing that is stopping me is that there is no support for plugins yet.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I am not going to analyze both of these the same way as your first source, but, firstly, the second one is not even a paper, just a bunch of graphs with no methodology etc. Secondly, I would look at where are your sources coming from. Both of these are not scientific institutions and both of these are basically from the same source, which is conservative “think tank”.

If you want someone who explains how these statistics are often misleading, I would look at this video. It basically deals with the exact same arguments from Lauren Southern.

Please don't use random articles as sources for such statements. At least use something that is based on some real research, even though it is often flawed.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago

First of all it is not from the USA but from New Zealand. I am not saying that a study that is done on one country cannot provide some useful insight, but you should be aware of that, especially in studies like this. Societal norms are widely different across the world, so trying to argue for something like this should be done from research across the world.

You think alcohol and drug abuse leads to a healthy life?

No, and I never claimed to. Personally, I really don't like both alcohol and drug use. But I certainly wouldn't make such sweeping statements as.

It is a sign of deep internal instability

Alcohol use in particular is highly culturally dependent. For example, my country is one of the highest alcohol consumers per capita, but we are a fairly happy country (at least as much as possible in this capitalist hellhole).

Btw, I just looked at the original study that that article is based on. It only concerned itself with cannabis and alcohol, and it didn't differentiate between those two. So again, not really a good source. Overall, I wouldn't base your opinion on something on one random article, especially when it just tries to summarize a paper. Try to at least read the original paper.

Why can you not see it comes down to these people hating the concept of committing to a partner, using each other like meat, thus revealing personality issues and internalised horrible ideas of how a society should be?

Source? I could think of many reasons why. People don't know what they like, so they want to explore both romantically and sexually. People evolve and change over time, and sometimes the partner they though are perfect actually wasn't. Or there are people that don't mind that their partners are having sex with other people. There are so many explanations of why someone would want to have sex with multiple partners, I really don't see why you would come to such a conclusion.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Did you not even read that article? First of all, all the participants are from one country, which in itself limits its usefulness. Secondly, there is a huge issue with correlation/causation, is it that people who engage in casual sex might engage in more drinking/drugs?

Most importantly, even if we disregard everything above, it would prove nothing. It just says that people who have lots of sex also drink/use drugs more. It even mentions it in the article itself, the likely reason why women are more affected is due to the societal pressures.

We live in a society that is very hostile to polygamy. Which is probably the reason most people would find negative consequences for engaging in it. This will be the same for any people that are engaging in something considered “weird”.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I am very curious about this. It would be really nice if federation in git took off. Hopefully, it could be the thing to finally get more to move away from GitHub.

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Sure they are much more notorious, but as it turns out most of the time there is absolutely no reason for that. Just take current hysteria around TikTok, even if it was correct (which I would argue it isn't) no one cares about all the other apps that we know for sure spy on you and give info to US government (and others).

view more: ‹ prev next ›