Probius

joined 6 months ago
[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago

Maybe, but there's also a more long-term force in the other direction. Bringing content from other platforms to Lemmy means that Lemmy has more content and people are less likely to go elsewhere to get their fill. If the best of Reddit is available on Lemmy, why bother going to Reddit? It's the same thing as how Reddit used to have lots of Twitter screenshots on it back when Twitter was worth screenshotting. The people taking the screenshots likely use both anyway and wouldn't stop if they weren't allowed to post Reddit stuff here.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

A screenshot doesn't give them traffic. A link does.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ohhh okay, I didn't know that.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I appreciate your nuanced view. I'd love to live in a world where personal cars were obsolete. It just needs a lot of infrastructure.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

While I would like to avoid divulging too much personal information, there are disabled people I know for whom not being able to get there by car would make it a non-starter. Public transit isn't great where I live (US) and the nearest bus stop is outside of their walking distance. Maybe it's different in the UK.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz -2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Different people have different needs. Some people can't get around by car unless someone else is driving, myself included. Other people can drive, but can barely walk. If they have nowhere to park, that hurts some disabled people. It's not like not having somewhere to park magically converts the entire area into an idyllic car-free utopia with trams running every which way.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

It doesn't sound like they typically check for most items, just the expensive ones and the date on the receipt. That makes it even more theater and less practical.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Of course, it's perfectly reasonable that if you know someone stole something, you can stop them. Under the prerequisite conditions section, it is stated that:

The shopkeeper has reasonable grounds to suspect the particular person detained is shoplifting.

Wouldn't that mean that someone who has done nothing suspicious other than refusing the check would not be giving anyone reasonable grounds to stop them? Or does just refusing count as reasonable grounds and make the check effectively legally mandatory?

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

someone who can is waiting(and the salarymen can, shopkeeper’s privilege apparently in the US)

Can you elaborate on this? I've never heard of it.

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Captchas are actually a great tool for reducing spam and botting. Depending on the platform, they can directly benefit you. Captchas and manual approval for Lemmy account signups are directly responsible for the lack of spambots on this platform. The problem is that captchas got co-opted to force people to give companies free AI training data.

view more: ‹ prev next ›