Primarily0617

joined 2 years ago
[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you need to be able to have vacations and save for retirement and do fun things from time to time

ahem actually people only need to exist and survive until they work themselves to death getting tangled in the gears of my spinning jennys

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

your phone can't work if your carrier doesn't know where you are

on top of that, advertisers put bluetooth receivers everywhere, which will log your phone as having been nearby, even if you don't connect

on top of that, you can do the same bluetooth trick with wifi endpoints

plus your phone has a gps/glonass/whatever receiver in it

probably other reasons too but those are the ones i can think of off the top of my head

yes you can maybe mitigate all of these, but there are probably ones i haven't thought of that people much smarter than me have, so why take the risk?

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a platformer mixed with stardew valley

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

oh no then we'll have stopped the genocide for NOTHING

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Statistically, your one vote is as meaningful whether you vote for a major party or a third party.

You don't vote to get your preferred candidate in. You vote to pull the one that might closer to where you want them.

Voting for Biden is voting for a genocide, whether you want it to be or not. Assuming Biden gets in, all you've done is tell the DNC that their voter base actually don't care all that much about genocide.

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

just vote for a third party or none of the above

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how would your reputation carry over when nobody in the universe knows who you are? it sounds like you're just inventing a new thing you have to grind

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

if RPGs have done this plenty of times, then it's not a new idea, and why are we talking about it in the context of the new ideas starfield had?

people replay games for the gameplay. bethesda wanted a game you could replay for the story, and then have it still work as a story when the player deliberately sequence breaks everything because of their omniscience

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I don't even mean I wouldn't trust Obsidian. I mean I wouldn't trust the specific team they had working on New Vegas, which was an absurdly stacked deck that they seemingly haven't been able to re-create since.

Films you can re-watch twice and have it be just as good the second time are rare. Bethesda wanted a film you could rewatch ten times while simultaneously larping as a cosmic god and trying to break everything you could.

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Dark Souls lore seems deeper than it is because it's less coherently presented than in TES.

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (10 children)

All the new ideas in Starfield fall into one of two categories:

  • The technology doesn't exist to implement it.
  • The talent at Bethesda is incredibly ill-suited to implement it.

The Bethesda response to fans saying their main storyline was trash was to make a game where the main storyline is the primary focus and draw of the game? That's a bold move.

The NG+ stuff is a cool idea, but again, Bethesda just fundamentally lacks the talent to implement it. You can't hit what they were aiming for with a handful of gimmicks. I wouldn't even trust the team behind New Vegas, or whoever writes at Larian, to do it justice.

view more: next ›