Poopfeast420

joined 2 years ago
[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

Used it, it was probably the best, but still bad. If not for work, it would have been good enough though.

Most of the RDP implementations are also just based on FreeRDP, so they're basically the same. I had terrible picture quality on all of them, even over local network, and the USB passthrough barely worked.

Tbh since I need the system for work, I wasn't able to test stuff super long. Maybe I should install Linux on a secondary system, so I can just play around and try stuff.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I've been on Windows 11 since it was released. The only problem I had were NVIDIA drivers sometimes causing a bluescreen (mainly my fault).

Linux doesn't work for me currently, since I use RDP to connect to systems for work, and RDP clients on Linux are ass.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah, it would be insane if the game's also uninstalled, but that second system still needs to be at hand or someone needs to "eject" it. It's a really dumb system.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I think the only thing that's worse with the new Steam system is that everyone has to be in the same country.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If we still need to buy one copy of a gamer per simultaneous player,.then the rest of the differences are just ceremony.

Like I said, to me, the differences are not as cut and dry, it depends on you situation.

As for the virtual game card, Nintendo actually uses eject, load, and borrow in their article, so it sounds to me it's basically like a physical game you have to move between consoles, not just simple check.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago (8 children)

I think you can argue if Steam does the whole sharing thing better than Sony or Microsoft. On Playstation and Xbox you can just by one copy of a game, but play it simultaniously with someone else, but it seems like that's limited to one other console (setting the home console).

On Steam you need one copy for every accout playing the game, but you can have 6 accounts in your family, and unlimited devices. Without family share, your own account can only play on one device at a time, but then, why not just make a new Steam account and join a family.

The virtual game cards from Nintendo are also like Steam, since they need one game copy for each player, but also only on one device.

Seems to me like Nintendo is not as good as the others, when it comes to sharing digital games. Sharing physical is of course still possible and easy on console.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (10 children)

but it’s about as good as what Steam does.

Explain, since I don't think that's true.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The release was "narrowed down" once already, so this doesn't mean anything.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Confirmed like the announcement on that one xbox show?

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 months ago

What do you think the C-Button is for?

I hope it's the Cum-Button.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So, I think most of the Trails games are garbage, but since I played them like five years ago over two months, up to CS3. Now I feel obligated to play the rest as well. Hate-playing or something.

Since there's been a bunch of new games released since then, I might have to do another one of these "marathons."

view more: ‹ prev next ›