Polar

joined 2 years ago
[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 71 points 2 years ago (6 children)

If the government wanted to kill people, they'd kill those who refused to comply.

So the thing that would make more sense, is that the COVID vaccine was an antidote, and the government was going to release a toxic gas to kill everyone who didn't take it.

But nah, their argument is that the government is killing those who comply. Ya, because that makes sense.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Entitled? I never asked anyone to buy me a phone. Go be angry elsewhere. The fuck πŸ˜‚

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Honestly the worst part about Windows is the fact that sometimes it will restart to install updates through the night, closing everything you had opened. The preinstalled garbage is also annoying, but can be uninstalled easily.

Outside that, it honestly just works. It's great for old people.

My experience has been the same as yours. Trying to get WiFi, Audio, webcam, bluetooth, GPU, etc. working on a Linux distro is a nightmare. Then when you get it working somewhat, it'll just be randomly borked the next time you boot your system. Requiring another 5 hours and 600 tabs of research to figure out what you did to fix it the first time.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Linux isn’t trying to compete with Windows for the desktop market. Making fun of it for failing to do that is dishonest at best.

~~2001~~ ~~2002~~ ~~2003~~ ~~2004~~ ~~2005~~ ~~2006~~ ~~2007~~ ~~2008~~ ~~2009~~ ~~2010~~ ~~2011~~ ~~2012~~ ~~2013~~ ~~2014~~ ~~2015~~ ~~2016~~ ~~2017~~ ~~2018~~ ~~2019~~ ~~2020~~ ~~2021~~ ~~2022~~ ~~2023~~ 2024 IS THE YEAR OF LINUX!!!!

It caters to the very specific needs and wants of programmers, and it does that incredibly well.

Too bad Linux users don't understand this. Lemmy is full of Linux nerds acting like Linux is a viable replacement to Windows/MacOS, when it's not for the majority of users.

The fact that it can now run some quite high-end art and video production packages is a bonus

Ya, despite the fact Davinci free cannot edit h.264 or h.265 video on Linux, or that neither the free or PAID versions can use AAC audio. Very professional.

but no one with an ounce of sense (coughgardinerbryantcough) would seriously argue that Linux will be ready for mass adoption at any point within the next ten years.

You've guys been saying this for decades lol.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

okay punk. have a shitty day man.

Class. Telling me to have a shitty day because I asked you not to keep asking me about private information. Take the hint. Back off, creep.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

To drive there? How would you expect I get to my library 35km away?

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yea, I pay for mine. The fuck is this entitled ass comment about?

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

A pixel? None of that comes pre-installed and it's one of the only devices that comes with the ability to unlock it and flash a custom ROM day 1.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Lmao Linux users cope with the "I don't care, I don't even want it" excuses. Comes out so naturally when you have to give up nearly everything on Linux.

I don't want to answer you, stop asking, creep. Get the hint.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Or save the time and gas money and download it.

I mean shit, I don't even have a DVD burner in any of my computers. Haven't for a decade and a half. You expect me to grab my external drive to burn a copy? I can download anything on my gigabit connection in 5 minutes.

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I don't hate subscription based services if they're priced fairly and make sense.

Paying monthly for a service that then starts giving you less, adds more premium plans, introduces ads, etc. is garbage.

Paying for a game, then having to pay a monthly fee to play (WoW, for example), is garbage.

Paying for software, but then having to pay monthly to use the software, is garbage.

Paying for software, but then having to pay monthly to be allowed to contact support (Blue Iris), is garbage.

But paying for things like Spotify, where you get access to pretty much all songs as they release, have no limit on how much you listen to, and it has a fair student pricing or family pricing, that's fine. Way better than paying per song.

I mean shit, if I paid for every song I have in my library on Spotify, I'd owe $1430. My Spotify is $17 per month, spit between 4 people, so I pay $4.25. I can either pay for every song in my library and not add any more, or pay for Spotify for 28 years and continue growing my library..

[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I am very happy with my AMD CPU and GPUs, thank you very much.

Lmfao. Enjoy your last gen ray tracing and garbage FSR.

so what is it?

I am not telling you, creep. When someone doesn't want to answer personal info, stop asking. It's sad you need to be told this.

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί