PokerChips

joined 2 years ago
[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

Very impressive study. I was surprised to learn that Ruby was categorized as functional but not object oriented. I thought that was their whole shstick.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

What they do have in common is that they are both O.G. languages.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago

This reminds me. I got a search engine to build.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

There are not enough squirrels. They would be extinct quick.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

The best i could find is this mish mash of multiple commercials. Just picture the one with the 2 guys but extended version. It was very cringe. And the only one they showed for a about a year.

https://vimeo.com/893438804

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Reminds me of a netcredit commercial where 2 dudes are dry humping each other.

I think some intern finally spoke up and that skit finally got yanked.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

I actually see this working out in the long run at least. In the mean time, there will be a lot of creativity while everyone tries to "invent the wheel" while great ideas perculate up during the stabalization phase.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's the new rate for all us non-clickers?

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I'd say it's wierd to google such a generic phrase when the question can be answered by a thread of people that already knows.

I for one appreciate the streamlined conversation.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Nice. Got a quick fix today.

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Don't see how this is a fine. Take it back. Get your rebate. And bonus is that i don't have to walk through your trash.

view more: next ›