PeriodicallyPedantic

Huh, interesting.

I don't think I like that

I mean, I wasn't gonna say anything, but 👀

But you can you still downvote on content from other instances? It'd be kinda strange if an instance prevented their users from downvoting elsewhere

Its not clarifying anything.

His point is only valid for the most literal pedantic interpretation of "client list". An interpretation that any author should be embarrassed about insisting on.

So, between the choices of
"this prolific and renowned author has literal interpretation and refuses to accept any other interpretation"
or
"author infamous for including child SA in a novel, supports defense of child predators"
I know which one I lean towards

Considering that Linus himself only makes binaries for windows and mac, and doesn't bother packaging for Linux because it's so painful, I'm not surprised that the immich folks didn't make one.

It's just strange that, despite criticising Trump constantly, he'd choose this specific thing to defend him on.

He could have said nothing.
He could have reasonably assumed that "client list" is short hand for data on who the clients are; a list formed posteriori by the investigators.

But instead he said "people who think there is a way to learn the identity of the clients are crazy".
For a successful author, such poor grasp on the language is suspicious.

Come as you get knocked down

Nice try, fed.

15 years ago I'd believe you were a teenage edgelord, but even they are more savvy than this, nowadays.

You used a word that has "anal" in it.
Point: me

I agree.

I believe it's up to the devs to decide if they want to, or to not include it as a statement.
But I don't think that there should be any kind of stigma with having (or using) difficulty options.

There is no way someone could hallucinate such a boring dystopia.

When served up a beautiful dish prepared by a 3 star Michelin chef, you don't eat the flatware.