PeriodicallyPedantic

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I feel like most jobs require arithmetic.
But it is not my career to be a pedant, just my role in life ๐Ÿ˜œ

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

๐Ÿซฑ๐Ÿ€
The closest I could come to "touch grass"

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I mean, I'm just pedantic; double check with a mathematician, to be sure lol

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

And now you're pretending like you don't actually care, despite going HARD about this earlier, acting like a card carrying eugenicist.

Cry harder, and paste in a couple more emojis โŒšโŒšโŒš

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Hey, that's my job!

Also I don't think that's technically the technical classification. I think that sidedness is an attribute that simply doesnt apply to curves.
You can approximate curves with some number of sides, and the approximation gets more accurate as the number approaches infinity, but it doesn't actually have the infinite sides.

I'm not a math major, but I always considered it that a square is a special case of rectangle, a rectangle is a special case of parallelogram, and a parallelogram a special case of a quadrilateral, a quadrilateral a special case of a simple polygon.

This shape isn't a polygon, so it cannot be a square.

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

You flippantly say, convincing absolutely nobody.

Great job ๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (8 children)

"I'm not gleeful about disabled people facing challenges" he says as he gleefully mocks people for caring about challenges that disabled people face.

Leave your mom's basement. Touch grass. Talk to a real person.

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

This is a stupid take and you should feel bad.

The fact you are acting gleeful in response to an image of a completely unnecessary hurdle for people with physical display suggests that you're probably a bad person to be identifying those on high horses.

[โ€“] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is no way to know that were not constantly dying and being replaced. The experience of continuity may be an illusion because you don't notice that you're only alive for a split second, and replacing the consciousness that was alive a split second before you.

Again, I'm not trying to make the world of cars more realistic. I don't care that they would have evolved differently, that's not something from the movie. I'm not interested in imagining how the movie could have been different.

Cars is a movie where cars are people
We are people
Cars exist in our world
Imagine that's what we were.

There are more reasons to brag and show off than just to seek validation. Their vanity may not be dependent on you.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ