Was going to find this cause Shotcut fits right there against Premere and AfterEffect. Supports HDR editing(ie. you can extract clips off playstation 5's HDR video recording) but not re-encoding and export as HDR.
recall, immediately foot the bill and still have to fix something they probably haven't fix yet. (the article mention maybe microcode update in August. ) taking lawsuits, they can drag it on and buy themselves time to figure out how to deal with it.
the legal side thing is, unless the claimant can prove that intel "knew" about this and still selling the broken item, there is not much they can do about it other than going through warranty process and get a replacement. However, now many outlet prove that to be a case from small companies to big data centers, they can't keep selling those units as if they are not broken. Some thing needs to be done properly(like as MS for a mandatory update if detect such CPU or work with MB for BIOS update with a feature block) from their legal dept and make sure new buyers have ways to mitigate it.
They can simply replace the lid with new ones.
To make it worse, even if they went through the gauntlet to get citizenship and can vote, who are gonna be on the ballot so people can get better life?
If everything adapt the pc building modular approach we would be in a much better place, some of the replaceable components are already modular if you see the ifixit tear down, it's just that the manufacturer spends more time trying to ruin your chance at properly open it without damage other parts. Same thing for many electronics, the opening part are the worst as you can damage the casing(crack the clips bent stuff, broke the ribbon etc) or some one way bs. Even opening a freaking hair dryer to clean up the internals is a challenge.
Yes. If for device or system that use dx->vulkan wrapper like proton, then it's possible to enable it. It's a driver side provided feature once compiled to support it you can enable it. (like frame gen basically)
edit: features like FSR3 or DLSS requires game side support means the game binary needs to compile with their tech to support.
frame gen is not miracle algorithms, you need high enough frame rate to begin with to get smoother interpolation. And spider man or games that have fast change of camera speed disregarding momentum is not going to help.
In short: (after I found the env canada link: https://weather.gc.ca/?zoom=3¢er=35.77893250,-115.91878577 ) And short form one: https://weatherkit.apple.com/alertDetails/index.html?ids=10a884f0-9771-5ec3-8031-53940dcdcdcf&lang=en-US&timezone=America/Vancouver
Daytime high might get low to mid 30s with over night low around ~17 degrees. Daytime high lower to mid 20s on Wednesday.
Drink a lot of water, go spend the afternoon/night in the mall or air-conditioned places if your place do not have AC.
okay, so let me try explain a little bit why this is very likely not going to happen.
- it's a "public" transportation service that's pay per use, first come first serve, there are different fee depending on time/distance/etc.
- in order to "restrict access" say, use the commercial/residential parking lot as example, you carve out certain part of the capacity that only BC resident can use and BC tax payer have to foot the bill. The parking lot example, commercial side and residential side strata foot the bill for the maintenance and design which area/zone etc for the residential one and it's gates/etc.
- practically, 80% of BC don't even use that service, source: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/data/statistics/people-population-community/population/pop_subprovincial_population_highlights.pdf 2021 about 5.2m in BC http://viea.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2021SOTI-Report-WEB.pdf 2021 report says +1.2% population for 10,272, so 100% of population is around 856k. which compare to 5.2m is 16% So I lump in another 4% that are not counted to Vancouver Island region but closely tied to the region which should be pretty fair estimate.
That means, if the people that won't use the service has to pay and reserve for the people that do use the service that would be unfair thus usually, a "toll" would be put in place to cover the cost of transportation deficit. You might ask, what deficit? To have reserved space for resident to use ferry, they have risk of running the ferries with empty space reserved for resident use. Those would have to be "over reserved" for service guarantee. If they under reserve, then you simply have 2 choice, either queue with tourist or queue for the next for resident.
- we have not even talk about the environment impact of reserving those spots just for residents instead of doing as much full ferry each time. That cost is footed by the whole BC as a province. (assuming we do have a carbon budget)
In the end, it's all about running cost and tourism scheduling. Let me run a very simple situation. Say, a tourist group booked a trip to run a bus with everything scheduled properly. Now, if resident have priority queue, means the whole tourist bus's schedule is NOT guaranteed. If the fluctuation of local traffic suddenly spike, the tourist group might face 2 hours+ delay. Which is simply not acceptable for a tourism company to run such risk, the tourism industry might simply opt for other first come first serve transportation service. Which would have a big impact to Vancouver Island. And if you remove tourism traffic from ferry, then you foot more cost per trip or face reduced scheduling.
The fact that for all 17+ years I lived in BC I only take the ferry round trip 3 times, and yet the tax is budgeted for subsidize it for more affordable traveling for the Van Island residents I think first come first serve is a fair compromise. Cause the people the visit Vancouver Island for tourism will most likely also visit other part of province, lower cost of transportation benefits everyone.
yeah, I'd have to solder a PS1 controller to printer port back then. even when controller moves to wireless(like dual shock 3) the protocol was proprietary until windows have a proper driver for them.
just move to unified vram like console would be best.
Someone will have it and then later if necessary there will be community re-written version. (crowd funded for example ) Doesn't make sense to chase down a taken down version at this point.
edit: article was updated, the maker gonna re-do the parts from pre-AMD funding point so it's a clean one.