PassingThrough

joined 8 months ago
[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Use plz and add a Makefile? :)

plz make sandwich

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Might I suggest a hybrid approach? Pull from a DDL, verify quality, fix metadata, and then put your whole library up on a searchable DC like Soulseek or a DC++ group(are those even still around anymore?) Torrents if you want to make the effort of compiling the torrents.

I looked at Soulseek and it appeared like a mess of disorganized libraries, random compilations, and I couldn’t even find some major bands or albums on it. But I suppose that’s to be expected.

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean Felon is pretty up there, he’s President! Note you have to think about which I may be referring to.

How they got it doesn’t much change that they do got it. And they want more, and they want anything slowing them from more or threatening to take any of it, to go away.

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Is it? The bottom of the totem pole might believe that and feel empowered by it, but I think the top is only concerned about themselves. I just don’t see them wasting the McCalories sparking a real thought about anything but their own gains. Sure, they don’t like us poors, but really they don’t like being told they have to treat us fairly. Or that there’s anyone above them that can say that.

As in, they don’t exactly want to gut the government purely out of desire to throw us into suffering, the suffering is just a bonus to the original goal of never ending wealth, and never being told what they can’t do.

Cut the spending, cut their taxes. Cut the public agencies, open up private revenue streams. Big G wants to say you can’t destroy your competition and become the only company people can send money to? Says you can’t bulldoze that forest? Can’t dump your waste in the river for free? Can’t have your workers working for next to nothing? Cut the agency. Cut the program. Become Gods.

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I try to wonder, what’s the 4D chess here?

R’s always want to dissolve these agencies, claim they overreach and abuse, and suppress their poor, unfortunate monopolies. But the mass opinion so far is hell no, we don’t want the unregulated hellscape that follows, we don’t want unchecked corpus.

So now that they can, do they order said agencies to actually overreach and abuse, so when it is offered to end it later it gets celebrated and accomplished?

Or should I give up because it’s not actually supposed to make any sense or semblance of a plan? Or is it all just a mess of distraction and unrest?

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 96 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is the future they want.

Why get warnings for “free”(tax funded) through a costly government service when you can get warnings for $19.99 per month, with annual price hikes for “inflation”. EULA declares warnings are not guaranteed, and subscription is non-refundable.

Won’t someone think of the C-Suite and defund NOAA and NWS already?!? /s

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

This is why I can’t/don’t have a lot of the “best practices” in my family archive. I’m not encrypting local drives, I’m not using BTRFS, or a ZFS pool. If I did I’d have to ensure my Will provided for the lawyer to hire a tech shop to help recover them. No, exFAT and NTFS, in the clear so those left behind can just plug them in and get to making their own copies. Otherwise the archive would die with me.

Does that mean someone could steal my drives and go through my family photos? Sure. I hope it brings them much guilt, something a garbled encrypted drive could never do.

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

exFAT is a newer and viable alternative to FAT32, with better size limits and some pretty good cross-platform capabilities. That said, if your primary access is through Windows, NTFS may have some better features and is at least read-only on other platforms.

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As I understand it, their data does in fact enter into the Wayback Machine. They are just also available in the direct WARC archive files(which IMO sounds beneficial to the idea of exporting in bulk to another backup host). At least that’s how their FAQ reads.

And given that they focus on web crawling, and not other arbitrary data formats that IA accepts, 2.8% of over 100 petabytes is still a respectable amount of data.

That said, help is help. If another archival project team wants me to run a worker node so they can distribute load and dodge crawler blocks, let me know, I’ve got space.

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

Time to go back to the dark ages, figuring the weather based on Gam Gam’s aching bunions.

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 21 points 6 months ago

Some other platforms also tested and reversed blockages on democratic and anti-trump sentiment. That was a “bug” too. https://archive.is/BkVAi

How quickly we forget, which I guess is the point.

[–] PassingThrough@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Fair, but that just makes it worse. Means we really do have a single point of failure. Alexandria anyone?

view more: ‹ prev next ›