Parsani

joined 2 years ago
[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Why don't we just get an actual barrel of oil to do it next time?

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

It is at work everywhere, functioning smoothly at times, at other times in fits and starts. It breathes, it heats, it eats. It shits and fucks. What a mistake to have ever said the id. Everywhere it is machines—real ones, not figurative ones: machines driving other machines, machines being driven by other machines, with all the necessary couplings and connections. An organ-machine is plugged into an energy-source-machine: the one produces a flow that the other interrupts.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

The gamification of relationships and its consequences...

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Time to start drafting the constitution of the People's (micro) Republic of Hexbear

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

but for the rest, confines itself to systematising in a pedantic way, and proclaiming for everlasting truths, the trite ideas held by the self-complacent bourgeoisie with regard to their own world, to them the best of all possible worlds.

Gonna email this to Larry Summers everyday

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Chapter 1 has been quite the trip. Difficult but very interesting and rewarding to grapple with. The commodity fetishism chapter is quite the finish.

mao-clap

P. S. It would be nice if the site mods stickied this on the front page to make it easier to find and drive more traffic to it.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Reject regimented time, return to unspecified duration.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

120 to 184 miles

Distance between China's coast and Taichung: 135 miles

lmao

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The physical body of commodity B gives a physical, independent existence for the purely social value-substance from our analysis which is imprisoned inside the use value of commodity A.

This was a part which I kept getting hung up on. It seems so straightforward but the way it is worded in Capital, and a bit here too, is difficult for me to fully intellectualize for some reason. The analogy Marx gives of "weighing" makes it pretty clear, so I don't understand why I find it so complicated lol

view more: ‹ prev next ›