Parsani

joined 2 years ago
[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

yea

The IRS will negotiate down though if you prove you can't pay it

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 55 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (29 children)

Frank Sysyn, a history professor at the University of Alberta, says it’s accurate to say that Hunka was not a Nazi, despite fighting for Nazi Germany, because non-Germans weren’t allowed to join the party.

He said Canada's choice to allow veterans of the unit to live out their lives in the country ultimately came down to a decision that membership in the unit was not reason enough to prosecute someone, if there was no proof they committed individual crimes. Ukrainians, he added, are far from the only group of postwar immigrants to benefit from such an approach.

"Most of our Italian immigrants of the 1950s, if they were men of a certain age, had probably been in the Italian army and fought for Fascist Italy," said Sysyn, who is a member of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies.

John-Paul Himka, a University of Alberta professor emeritus and the author of a book about Ukrainians and the Holocaust, said many of the young men who joined the Galicia division in 1943 were motivated by the atrocities they witnessed under Soviet occupation, including the murder of thousands of political prisoners and mass deportations to labour camps. “So for the people in this region, the Soviets were the nightmare and the Germans were relatively tolerable," he said. "So that, I think, explains why so many of them thought that what they were doing fighting against the Soviets was patriotic.”

He said some Galician units did participate in atrocities, including murders in Polish villages. The division had an antisemitic newspaper and accepted into its ranks “policemen who had been very important in the Holocaust, who had rounded up Jews for execution and sometimes executed Jews themselves," he said.

...

Klufas blames the branding of Hunka as a Nazi on "Russian disinformation," adding, "the fact that he was a soldier does not mean that he was a Nazi." He also said there was nothing wrong with Parliament applauding a man "who fought for his country." However, he conceded that it "maybe wasn't correct" in the circumstances, given that the people there didn't fully understand the issue.

what-the-hell

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why do we not have this as an emoji? I thought our servers were in Moscow

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago

Yeah, and the GOP wants cuts from that funding so they won't do it. The whole system just creates a terrible opportunity for this shit to happen again and again though.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The lasagna disappears when Bordiga eats it, and we might say that the former is refuted by the latter; in the same way when the empty plate comes, the lasagna may be explained to be a false form of Bordiga's existence, for the empty plate appears as its true nature in place of the lasagna. These stages are not merely differentiated; they supplant one another as being incompatible with one another. But the ceaseless activity of their own inherent nature makes them at the same time moments of an organic unity, where they not merely do not contradict one another, but where one is as necessary as the other; and this equal necessity of all moments constitutes alone and thereby the life of the whole.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago (4 children)

GOP wants to cut funding to a bunch of shit, including Ukraine, and do some fucked shit at the border. They seem pretty split on it though. I assume the Dems will cave eventually and they will compromise soon. idk tho, I haven't been following it that closely.

It always amazes me that the US has a system where if the government fails to do the one thing it has to do, they just close it.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's why I won't vote for them. I'm a single issue voter.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (4 children)

What was that?

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago (6 children)
[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

I think this is what you are looking for: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35576-9

“We demonstrate, first, that exposure to Russian disinformation accounts was heavily concentrated: only 1% of users accounted for 70% of exposures,” the scholars wrote in the journal Nature Communications. “Second, exposure was concentrated among users who strongly identified as Republicans. Third, exposure to the Russian influence campaign was eclipsed by content from domestic news media and politicians. Finally, we find no evidence of a meaningful relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.”

https://theintercept.com/2023/01/10/russia-twitter-bots-trump-election/

P. S. If anyone has something that researches "bots", fake accounts, or astroturfing used by the US (either the state or other groupe) to influence its own domestic or international Internet discourse I would like to read it. I know the US dumped a bunch of money into paying influencers, which imo is the same shit they pointed at Russia for doing, but I'm having a hard time finding it. Here is something on Canada doing something similar: https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/feds-spent-more-than-600k-hiring-influencers-in-2021-1.5842024 (but in this case I'm kinda okay with it because it seemed to be a marketing push for vaccination).

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Don't give them any ideas

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It is certified 100% grade A liberalism

view more: ‹ prev next ›