Pandemanium

joined 2 years ago
[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

An enormous chunk of housing sits unused and empty because real estate speculators want to rent them out at exorbitant prices rather than use it for it's intended purpose of having a roof over people's heads.

If they are renting it out at exorbitant prices, then it's not empty. If it's empty, then they get zero money. You're saying it's both, which makes no sense. Interest rates and property taxes are both high right now. It costs investors money to hold empty property without renting it out. They don't have to wait for people to pay inflated prices. The demand is already there.

I'm all for more regulation, especially for developers and investors. Stiupulate that at least 50% of all new housing built be affordable. Give incentives to rehab old condemned properties. And stop letting AI algorithms determine rental prices.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When I looked it said 13.9 million. But how many of those are habitable? Does that number include Airbnbs? Properties stuck in probate or the foreclosure process? How many of them are in senior communities that don't allow younger people or families? The census data doesn't specify any of that.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Because there isn't enough housing that already exists.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's got to be a better way than sinking to their level.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

What about the overlap? Wouldn't most people who inherit that kind of money be... founding companies, becoming executives of said companies, making political connections to benefit their business, and investing? I don't see how you can separate most of these.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

I'd say it's not even capitalism but the rabid anti-tax people/movement. Third spaces like libraries and parks are paid for by tax money, and if people keep voting against raising taxes, well guess what. No more public spaces.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I agree. Beef had an Asian cast, and I thought it was way more entertaining and emotionally provocative than EEAAO.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But those kinds of plots (as well as the whole multiverse thing) have already been done in lots of shows like Rick and Morty, Futurama, Marvel, etc. I never understood why there was so much hype to begin with - the movie wasn't groundbreaking at all. It played out basically exactly how I thought it would, except with some incredibly unrealistic parental apology fantasy tacked on.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unfortunately those don't work for everyone.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm the same. I like reading about different worlds, but magic systems are so boring. I'm currently writing a book like what you describe - set on another planet but there's no magic, and everyone is human. We should really start a new genre, because post-apocolyptic scifi doesn't quite convey what I'm trying to do. But to call it fantasy would be way off. Problem is, most people assume other world = fantasy.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Fun fact, back in the 80s, cigarette companies owned most of the food production companies. They are responsible for creating most of the addictive natural and artificial flavorings. When they got slapped for making cigarettes addictive, they quickly sold off all their food holdings because they didn't want to be held financially responsible for making those addictive too.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one is recycling still-working cars after only 5 years. Unless you're talking about insurance deciding to salvage a vehicle after a wreck, which is a different story. Even those don't always get destroyed, some are parted out and some are probably shipped overseas to get a second life.

view more: ‹ prev next ›