If Harris truly saw Trump as a threat she would have at least come out against the genocide so that she doesn’t risk losing votes over it.
I have voted for Jill Stein but only because the Democrats blocked Claudia De la Cruz in Pennsylvania.
Edit: corrected tense
So much for pushing Biden left
So basically the same as Biden and Harris. Good thing I never considered voting for him.
The DNC has been faced with a political decision about whether it’s a greater risk to alienate centrist Israel supporters or leftist Palestine supporters in an election year when the literal collapse of any semblance of American democracy is on the table.
Biden was faced with an impossible choice, and so is Harris. But that danger will literally evaporate on November 6th.
So you are telling me that enabling the genocide was an election-winning tactic? Then the Democrats never needed our votes. Heck, maybe if I send them my home address they can bomb me and win even more votes with centrist Israel supporters.
Trump wasn't president, I never voted or will ever vote for him. We had zero success pushing Biden to stop the genocide why do you think we will have any success with Harris?
In 2020 I was told we could push Biden left.
"It is deeply concerning that China is trying to make the rich pay their fair share in taxes" -- western media, probably
I played the free Astro Bot game bundled with the PS5 and found it to be a quality platformer and a nostalgic trip through Playstation history. I didn’t play the latest release but will eventually.
Punishing Democrats is a bonus extra if Democrats actually cared about losing votes. For me a vote for Harris is a vote for genocide. That’s why I am voting for Jill Stein and the Green Party.
Note: anyone who goes “but Trump” is getting blocked. The Democrats had 12 months to stop the genocide and chose not to. Harris could have distanced herself from it and chose not to. The genocide is worse than the last time Trump was president. The only way liberals see Trump as worse than genocide is if they see us as less than people.
The history of Western Sahara is more complicated than this article suggests. Until France and Spain divided the Moroccan Sultanate -AKA the Alawi Sultanate- during the scramble for Africa, it was all part of Morocco.
I have no idea how this could be solved, other than uniting the entire of Maghreb. On one hand Morocco has historical claims to the Western Sahara, on the other the monarchy is reactionary and corrupt and the people of Western Sahara have a right to self determination. Though in the grand scheme Sahrawis are not a distinct group of people than their Arab and Amazigh neighbors.
Mask off moment for the fascists