Copy of my other response: The way they respond to sexual abuse allegations, I've also heard they have a very non-leninist idea of what democratic centralism entails.
Also the ones in my area seem more interested in recruiting than doing literally anything at all outside of recruiting
The way they respond to sexual abuse allegations, I've also heard they have a very non-leninist idea of what democratic centralism entails.
Also the ones in my area seem more interested in recruiting than doing literally anything at all outside of recruiting
I'd settle for a split that creates a national communist organization
I'm definitely coming at this through rose tinted glasses (pardon the pun) because my local chapter are actual communists who disagree with the bernsteinist politics of DSA at large.
I just don't see any alternative orgs to hop onto at the moment tbh.
I wish there were more left orgs but the PSL and the Greens aren't it.
Not saying to do entryism, I think the org is organically moving left as left folks have more success.
I guess the question is is the DSA hopelessly captured by the dems or not? I know my local chapter isn't, I know some who are, I'm not sure about nationals.
Do you have to defend your comrade when they're doing lib shit like refusing to meet with the president of Cuba?
I’ll emphasize again, and not a attack on the person who wrote it but a reminder of reality, DSA is not a communist party.
Not a communist party, yet
Hopefully the more effectively organized left wing can succeed in eventually taking it over, this last wave of elections seems promising to that effect.
:bloomer:
I think you're misreading me in search of a dunk.
I said the commie caucus not the Commie caucus
The Commie caucus are less commie then Red Star.
Also I was calling R&R succdem as a reductionist insult, what would be a more accurate insult?
The trots and succdems are currently the minority faction on the national political committee?