OurToothbrush

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

I mean we have two parties fundamentally representing similar donor interests, they swap controlled opposition roles which is more convincing than one party constantly being controlled opposition.

The US, and bourgeois democracies in general, have less political variation than one party socialist democracies. In China you have everyone from liberals (right wingers) to Maoists in government. In the US you basically only have liberals and scratched liberals.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (5 children)

My personal belief is that is he’s elected, our contry is on course for a soviet style breakup.

What do you mean by this? We already have austerity politics, and there isn't a foreign superpower in control of most of our media apparatus.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

It is literally more likely for a socialist revolution to happen in the US than for us to use STV enough to choose the president that way.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

The fact that your trans refugee friends continue to suffer is deplorable, but does not mean lgbt don’t have more rights now.

Trans people are experiencing low key genocide but we also have more rights now?

Things are better for some people and still desperately need to improve for many others.

Things are desperately worse for some people and have improved slightly for others.

Genocide of trans people > gay marriage on the impact on the queer community

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Literally just target the root cause of the problems, capitalism. All these problems don't exist in a vacuum.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Affordable Care Act, LGBTQ rights, marijuana reform…not to mention a Black man was president, and a Black woman is the party nominee.

Oh do lgbt people have more rights now? Oh fuck, I'll let my trans refugee friends know.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I know people who have small children and are still involved in socialist organizing.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

I’m less worried about that, not because there aren’t evil people among the Democrats, but because the Democrats are positioning themselves as the anti-fascist party at the moment. Starting up a fascist movement of their own at the moment would be bad business.

Their rhetoric sure is, but if you look at their actual policies they're continuing and escalating some of the worst things Trump did. Migrant concentration camps, massive police funding increases, worsening security and surveillance laws, the whole nine yards.

Also, fascism is the reassertion of the dominance of financial capital over the system and the democrats take money from the banks just as much as the Republicans.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm more worried about democrats having triangulated into fascism in the medium term tbh. Like competent diet fascism vs incompetent blood and soil fascism

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 32 points 9 months ago (5 children)

That is what I try to communicate to folks who are freaking out about Trump. You have to worry about the next guy, and the next guy, and the next guy. You can't just keep voting Democrat, you actually have to get organized if you want to stop fascism, because Trump isn't the font that fascism springs from, he is an inept conman who is riding the wave.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

think that is an absolutely absurd rule that can only stand to benefit the far-right.

Lol no you can still call fascists fascists. We are just asking you to use more accurate language.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Hey, you don't have to agree, you just have to follow the rules of the community.

view more: ‹ prev next ›