OpenStars

joined 2 years ago
[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He's tried. Nobody wants to fuck him:-P.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Those who seek, find.

Those who ask questions, eventually find answers.

Shrooms may be a shortcut, but the important thing is being RECEPTIVE to what they offer, I would wager.

My two cents anyway:-D.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

I think I'm in love with you now.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Consider: if you were to receive a message like you just sent, would it be likely to have changed your mind? Especially if you weren't you now, but like the you from let's say ten years in the past? It's just a thought, I hope you find it interesting.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

The only other possibility is if Congress, and therefore a large proportion of the entire United States of American society, were broken.

But if that were true, we'd see chaos in the streets, where people not being able to afford basic needs like houses or even food, would revolt and strike out in random shootings, at schools, churches, sports stadiums, parades and wherever else people gather together...

Shit.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

The only real answer to all of this:-P.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

What are you, happy on crack or something? Oh then, carry on my good man. :-P

I have decided: The Musk specifically asked us not to call it "Twitter", therefore I shall call it "Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter".

I dunno, maybe some days I could call it "Twitter" for short:-D.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

The prerequisite for being a hermaphrodite is to be a human. The Musk is not that.:-P

Also, ~~he~~ it wants us to specifically not call the company "Twitter" anymore. So I'm thinking maybe I could call it "Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter Twitter"? :-D

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

Good call.

I'm not sure anyone is even thinking about the candidates themselves at all anymore. Same for Harris & Biden - both sides have given up on a "good" and especially "popular" candidate. The entire focus is now on what we - both sides - can extract from them. Zero thought given to a situation like if Russia were to send nukes in the air and a decision has to be made within seconds, who's going to try to wake up the octogenarian to ask them what should be done? Well all know that someone else will be making the real calls, and we're giving up choosing directly who that will be.

So for like 80-90% of us, the masks are off: we already know that we will just pick a "side", bc that's all that we are allowed to do. Those very few people in the middle though... yeah that's going to be interesting, to see what they do. I think even most of them will end up picking a "side" rather than a candidate by the end of it all, but we'll see.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

I hope she kept it in the box it came in before pouring it into the glass. :-P

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

~~No they wouldn't~~, which doesn't matter bc they'd actually go along with it regardless, thus making no functional difference whatsoever.

They do what they are told, no matter how nonsensical it may seem, even to themselves.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Only to the "facts should matter" crowd. Other audiences come up with their own interpretations, regardless. :-|

view more: ‹ prev next ›