OpenStars

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 18 points 1 year ago

"You mean like Biden?"

That is how many conservatives on the streets talk, when interviewed by e.g. The Daily Show.

Words apparently mean the precise opposite now - people "defended" (rather than attempted to overthrow) the government, in "support" (rather than defiance) of the Constitution, and despite Trump's felonious facts, he is touted as a fucking "hero", and the legitimately elected President as the one who is "traitorous".

Sad.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He knew ~~been~~ (edit: back) then, that they were in love.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago

I mean... Ryan Gosling is pretty cute:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But will father finally approve of my accomplishments?

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

That comparison was apparently done previously.

The limited work on attachment and singlehood has produced inconsistent results (see Pepping et al., 2018 for a review) but suggests that single people are, on average, more insecure than those in relationships (Chopik et al., 2013).

Oh but I see what you mean - the "secure" sub-group(s) in this study would have strongly benefitted from that comparison yes. But it gets more complicated b/c the terms they chose to use aren't really the English-meaning of those words like "secure", but rather "low attachment-avoidance and low anxiety", hence insecure isn't a single category but three (anxious, avoidant, and fearful-avoidant).

Anyway the comparison to non-singleness could be a future follow-up study:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh... what? Every definition of "several" that I've ever heard is more than two but less than many, with the latter usually defined as five or more, or sometimes rather less than "a lot". So "several" means roughly 3 or 4, maybe 5 or even like 6 or higher but not yet "a lot". See e.g. https://www.dictionary.com/e/few-vs-couple-vs-several/. It sounds like those books you are referring to were using it wrong.

Regional variations surely exist though. And there could be more abstract usages too like several chips meaning like 10 or 20 but bc of their small size if the speaker felt the it was still not "many" or "a lot".

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then switch to use sth more like scp ASAP? :-)

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago

There is a saying: "facts have a liberal bias". :-) Some people ofc vehemently disagree.

Each instance is different, as is each community. Many do not follow their own rules, especially about "no politics allowed" but it creeps in everywhere. Tbf, modding is a hard job.

Though you can block communities that you don't want to see in your feed, and even entire instances (it won't stop people from them downvoting you or even commenting on your stuff, but it will stop notifications being sent to you when they do. Get to it via Settings -> Blocks -> Instance. Users and communities can be done similarly but it's easier to just visit their page and hit the block button there. There's a saying about that too: block early and often, for the sake of your sanity.

I don't know about instances - there's a lot to look at like lemm.ee, lemmy.cafe, reddthat.com, sh.itjust.works, etc. - but I hope this helped in other ways:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 8 points 1 year ago

Only if you follow the script(s).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 13 points 1 year ago

It's just waiting for an injury 🤕.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"Insecure" isn't quite the same as "unhappy", plus how many people in relationships are happy?

Also as it mentions, being with the wrong person is far worse than being alone.

Still, yeah that second sentence in the title is a bit disconnected from the first sentence, even if technically the truth.

Edit: this title is not the title of the article - interesting. That is just what was used here on Lemmy. The real title of the actual article is "Would you be happy as a long-term single? The answer may depend on your attachment style."

view more: ‹ prev next ›