OpenStars

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 5 points 1 year ago

The world is fucked up, so it makes sense. Probably you got toxic traits from your caregiver(s), explaining even why as a child you felt that way. Try to enjoy the ride anyway - I mean, what have you got to lose, really? :-P

e.g., learn to forgive, ending with yourself.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago

No more parrots, just a couple of very full snakes... :-P

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's not only that - it's also Huffman's golden parachute package.

The Reddit we knew is dead - long live the Fediverse.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 9 points 1 year ago

Beevix gonna die. Or should that be Tubee?

(Obviously both are false bc the "v" comes from Tuvoc, so it would be Beelix or Tuvbee)

img

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 10 points 1 year ago

In Peanuts, all adults would sound like "wah wah, wha wah wha wah wha wah", to which the children would respond as if they made perfect sense.

Then again, I prefer thinking about your second possibility so I'm going with that one:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

The effectiveness of the shitheadiness is a separate matter from its identity:-). If someone were to say downvote literally everything you ever did, within seconds of you doing it, and regardless of content, then that would be a shitty thing to do.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, mods only, and then only for their own communities - well, still, that's something (though I'd prefer prefer it opened up for everyone). Thanks for the link.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Being able to see the moderation history linked directly to a post was added then - but I don't see vote viewing nor recall hearing about it, which would have been a huge deal.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The issue is that currently someone can behave as a shithead via voting, even if not comments, with little fear of reprisal or even discovery.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

If OP mass-downvotes you, then ban them. As it is, you have the ability to mass-downvote them, without them even knowing that it is you doing it. Or maybe you wouldn't do that, but some would - I hope you see how unequal that relationship is.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago

The developers of Lemmy do not seem interested in anything less than banning people instance-wide, even from communities that they have never posted in before, so ironically shadowbanning is too subtle for them.

But I thought the only way someone could be shadowbanned now is at the individual user level? It would be nice to increase transparency even further - e.g. a message pops up if you try to reply to someone saying like "this user has blocked you" (possibly everyone from that instance) so that people do not waste time trying to get a message across that the recipient will never read.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago

The version code hasn't even hit 0.2 yet. Lemmy was founded by people who got banned from Reddit for being too toxic & extremist leftists, so went off to make their own replacement. They do what they like, and bc Rust is a difficult language to work with, not that many are willing to help.

Then after Huffman's debacle, we started to see Kbin, Mbin, Piefed, Sublinks, and perhaps more - but none even as advanced as Lemmy yet.

But more to the point, that's just the nature of an open network. Wouldn't Wikipedia suffer from the same issues? Though less of an issue than a social media framework I would wager.

view more: ‹ prev next ›