OpenStars

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago

I like coffee. It makes me feel good:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 5 points 1 year ago

It's part of inflation - in this case the cost may stay the same (or even go up a bit) but you receive a cheaper product in return for that similar cost than the past.

The important thing is that people will continue to purchase the product regardless, not knowing any better, and thus the manufacturer pockets the profits. Always remember that the goal of any corporation is to produce short-term value for its shareholders, and... no, that's it, period.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online -1 points 1 year ago

Authoritarian: do exactly what I did or else GTFO.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 10 points 1 year ago

They probably meant something entirely different - as in not so much that we are literally made of elemental materials forged in a burning sphere in space (a "reductionist" viewpoint) but rather than we contain an "aspect" of star-stuff, i.e. we may be animals that come from the earth, but we also contain within us an aspect of even the stars (more "holistic"?).

And perhaps beyond, if you believe that aspects of our Minds transcend physical reality itself - e.g. if we were a computer game but like, we could have been talking butterflies rather than talking apes, yet we were modelled after a "higher" world, to have five fingers on each hand and to be able to write our own stories, even make our own computer simulations "below" us.

Anyway there is no need to presume that they would have meant it in such an extremely literal manner as is common today.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online -1 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Okay, done - but probably needs substantial re-wording, for cleanliness, to use less offensive wording (although people will take offense at being labeled "extremist" regardless so I did not do too much in that regard), to hierarchically present less information at first and then more as it goes deeper, etc. It is, however, a start.

Ideally I would like for such places as ChapoTrapHouse to put a label onto their own communities - they are aware of how they are, and they like it, and many people across the Fediverse also enjoy it, so it is not that it is "bad" or "wrong", but rather like NSFW content it is "shocking" to stumble upon it unawares.

Though if they refuse to, then yeah, I'll take the hit and do the labelling for them, for the sake of the sanity of those who don't know how to stick up for themselves in the Fediverse.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 0 points 1 year ago (19 children)

I don't feel it's my place to push back on the matter of the locking of the specific post - as we covered, it's your vision that you need to implement.

But since you seem interested in the wider topic in general, I will say that warning people about the variety of ah... "behaviors" that one is likely to encounter across the Fediverse is precisely what I think is most lacking from most instances (at least those that haven't defederated from the most extremist ones, which e.g. my first instance Kbin had, but it is defunct now and anyway it was definitely in the minority there - e.g. across the entire Fediverse the only instance that I've ever seen that has defederated Lemmy.ml is Lemmy.cafe, which I only found about about today:-).

Every single person that I've told about Lemmy irl has come back in the next conversation to say "do you realize the extremist content (advocating for violent overthrow of the government) that is on there?" The thing is, having blocked it myself, I do tend to forget... for me Lemmy is about interesting conversations, fun memes, e.g. about computer coding, etc. But advocation for violence is not something so easily pushed aside, by someone new who doesn't know how to block yet (and what even would they block - a community? a user? an entire instance? being new, they simply do not understand yet what is likely to work, and what each decision entails. what they want to block is "disturbing content", but there is no checkbox for that, and seeing how untruthful so many people are, likely to never be one)

Communities like Chapotraphouse or The Donald or even so many posts in memes@lemmy.ml, which depict e.g. actual decapitation of landlords, is not something that "normal", "mainstream" people in the Western world are wanting to see. e.g. people leaving Twitter/X bc Musk is too extreme and Mastodon too problematic, only to find that generally speaking, Lemmy contains even more extremist content, though on what is claimed to be the leftist side.

So kudos for wanting to carve out an island of sanity. It remains to be seen how people, especially new ones, will find it, amidst all the noise, but still it's a laudable goal. And then I still don't get why new people wouldn't be interested in individual instances - I would be - but that's your business.:-P

I do think it would help to clarify the description of the community though, to make the aims more clear as the Fediverse grows, rather than you having to explain yourself to each poster, after-the-fact. Anyway I wanted to offer that thought - thanks for listening:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago

You can now... and if you were willing to go individually account-by-account, then you always could. I'm glad you found your niche - it's nice to widen your worldview and listen to it all, sometimes:-).

Though I'm on the other end of the spectrum: having spent nearly a decade listening to people's oddball takes on everything under the sun, and bending over backwards to accommodate it all as if it had some semblance of validity, I now find myself wanting to substantially narrow my input stream. Ngl, reading and watching/listening to - and more importantly thinking deeply about - such things as Innuendo Studios' The Alt Right Playbook, and the actual Trump presidency that caused our current inflation crisis and oh yeah killed more people than all wars combined iirc, really changed my approach on giving such viewpoints the time of day. There's a difference between sounding smart (like screetching: "show me your source material, bitch!", while also looking down on the recipient in every way), vs. actually being thus, imho.

However, if you want to keep your finger on the pulse of many sides regarding a particular matter, then I'm so glad that the federated servers allow us each to experience such a diversity of goals, even on the same platform! 😄

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 26 points 1 year ago

I hope you take this the right way when I say that you sound like you have lost your mind. Please, for our sakes, don't ever find it. 😜

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 7 points 1 year ago

Most instances have already blocked lemmygrad. Yours is one of a very few that has not.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online -1 points 1 year ago (22 children)

Regarding the recent locked post: as the creator it is indeed your vision that you need to maintain. I do hope that you will consider editing the description of this community to clarify such for people in the future:

Manual curation of great Lemmy discussions and threads

Otherwise it made sense that it would fit? Perhaps... "please, no drama" or some such? Well, it's a thought:-).

Second:

if YOU think a post is worth sharing, that’s good enough

But if actual posts are not desired, only comments underneath those, that would help to clarify as well. Otherwise "discussion" can be ambiguous.

I hope this meta-discussion itself is of interest:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not all. People over-generalize to forget that Lemmy.ml (and lately more people from Midwest.social) have always blended the experiences, being able to post to both "sides" like hexbear.net and lemmy.world that are defederated from one another.

And lemm.ee too though iirc they consider themselves more truly neutral than leftists?

And some alts too ofc:-).

view more: ‹ prev next ›