OpenStars

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago

Reportedly Reddit was not always that way though, earlier on.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago

Imagine if someone comments with what you see as a stupid take, but phrases it as a legitimate question indicating a willingness and even eagerness to learn: I often upvote such, bc that's an attitude that I'd like to see more of. The alternative for them would be to keep silent and remain in their ignorance?

Conversely, someone that says "^This" - I may likewise agree with whatever they responded to, but that's what upvotes on the latter content is for, and there's no need to also upvote the former along with that.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Apparently saying [some stuff] is now against the rules too even though they never told us

Lemmy.ml enacts censorship in this manner as well, as too does Midwest.social. But there are so very many other instances that do not, making the former easy to avoid while being able to engage with a ton of content:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 5 months ago

The ultimate trolly problem solution!

img

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Silly!? Low-effort?! On the Fediverse?!

img

Sounds like !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone to me! 🤪

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Isn't intelligence somewhat like the word "good" - as in, someone must be "good at" something, rather than inherently. Are cars "good"? (sometimes but not always...) Are cats? Are people? e.g. regarding the latter, there are many tasks for which a computing device is much better than most people - e.g. sorting a list of >1000000 elements, within one second (and then doing that task, without pausing or slowing down or error, in perpetuity). So the term "good" is only definable given a known fitness landscape.

Which then becomes somewhat naive to try to extrapolate beyond that - bc then someone good at sports could be said to be "intelligent" (at performing their particular sport?), or someone with high emotional flexibility at adaptive to new circumstances, etc. Ironically enough, someone with good accounting skills (always thinking within the box, that being the whole point for them) would likely make a horrible scientist (who needs to think OUTSIDE of the box), and potentially though not guaranteed vice versa.

So intelligence must be reflective of.... SOMETHING, blah blah hand waving meaning things that "I" am good at, basically. I know right, I have all the best-er-est words, I am such a jenius, and so on.

How would that measure the intelligence of a tribal person who has not seen abstracted geometrical shapes?

So yeah, they would be less "intelligent" at performing those tasks that are measured by the test. Corollary: people on average may legitimately have gotten more intelligent over time, depending on availability of schooling. Thus necessitating adjustment of the measurement system, if the real goal was not to measure "intelligence" and rather to provide some kind of separation among people based solely on that singular metric (which itself should be questioned, if the people doing so are wise rather than merely intelligent:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago

Hrm, I would hate to think so but... maybe? If only it would helpfully label itself, we could appreciate the message itself untainted by such worries.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 9 points 5 months ago

For or against won't matter when he's made king.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Invited Alexander over to an event, then regretted it THAT much (he had to make a plausible excuse somehow!:-P).

img

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago

Thanks - I actually had the setting turned on already but triggering it off and back on again caused it to start working properly, for whatever reason. Indeed that is a helpful indicator:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This account (that you responded to) was created a mere few hours ago. It might even have been created purely to troll people, possibly by someone who has gotten used to being banned using a recognizable account name.

On PieFed I find it very helpful to see an icon next to people's names indicating brand-new accounts. Some Lemmy apps can do that as well (I switched over to Voyager here to see if it would, but nope, at least not by default). Anyway I wanted to point out that it is a very useful feature, for exactly such scenarios as this!

view more: ‹ prev next ›