OpenStars

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

https://medium.com/@max.p.schlienger/the-cargo-cult-of-the-ennui-engine-890c541cebcb

This is an excellent article. I was just barely beginning to think (still subconsciously, i.e. still intuitively rather than focused) about leaving Reddit anyway, b/c of all its toxic BS, even prior to the blackouts and Rexodus, when I read this. I could not put it down!!!

But I had to, in order to go to work, and yet I picked it back up again ASAP and kept reading through lunch. And as a result, I gave up my mod position of two subs, left Reddit virtually entirely (though I partially stayed for a couple months to post about Kbin/Lemmy), and came here (the age of my current account does not match up b/c I was first on Kbin).

So yeah, it's long, but like... it PERFECTLY describes what I was intuiting! That Reddit was trying to turn me into a pedantic, narcissistic asshole, by curbing my impulses whenever I wanted to be kind yet encouraging the opposite to let my dark side flow against someone in order to demolish their arguments. Long, detailed answers to someone with specific questions and pleading for answers were penalized, yet short quips like "u suk" got heavily up-voted.

But it's not merely Reddit ofc, it's also Twitter, now X, and FaceBook, and any for-profit social media that prioritizes "engagement", e.g. talking rather than listening. e.g. why is Reddit's search function virtually nonfunctional, and why can each sub only have a maximum of two pinned posts? (I almost started looking into what it would take to write a bot that would allow for a megathread of megathreads, which the native Reddit refuses to provide for, except I could see the writing on the wall that bots were going to be obliterated, so I didn't bother.) Every single time such limitations line up with making new posts, their profits always magically seem to be increased - bc recall that ads are between posts, not between comments, so more posts = moar ads! Even if people stopped responding to people's questions... although usually someone somewhere would at least try, so it increased "engagement" of the type that furthered profits, while decreasing it overall. Hence these items were never going to be fixed.

Hence Reddit was enshittified. e.g. in r/Android people would constantly ignore the begging, pleading, demanding, and threatening from mods to put requests for new phone recommendations into the weekly megathread... and some huge fraction of posts to it were always like "what phone should I buy?", "what Android phone should I purchase?", "Which model phone should I get?" (until they could get removed) - often with no other details given, somehow extremely often back to back, as if nobody else in the whole entire world existed with the same identical damn question, these childish minds (of whatever age) just continually blurted out their requests for attention, spamming the entire world and preventing serious discussions about Android, which basically had to move elsewhere - i.e. the kids got so noisy that the adults had to flee the room looking for a more contemplative quiet.

Which is why we all find ourselves here:-). But even here, the addictive nature of even not-for-profit social media still has its dangers, as too does eating too much food etc., it's not the thing itself (once the profit incentive has been removed) but the amount that can be deleterious.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 11 months ago

If you go far enough back, the data turns quantum - as in having multiple simultaneous solutions to the waveform equation as to presence & location in time. And roughly every 20-30 years, it keeps splitting up again! :-P

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 11 months ago

This is exactly what I was going to ask: "Did they burn down the state of California as a result?". But instead, take my upvote!:-)

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 5 points 11 months ago

Who has the money for that?! :-P

That said, *I* get to decide what my own fucking gender means - not anyone else.

img

-Link

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 7 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Isn't exactly this kind of thing what is mostly responsible for the demise of Perl?

As I heard it told, the developers of Perl worked so long & hard on the next version after Perl 5, but then veered off to make a new language (Raku) and despite the reality being otherwise, people feared so much that Perl would die (i.e. that 6 would never materialize) that in the meantime "everyone" had switched to Python (despite it clearly being an inferior language - hehehehe:-P).

So that would be a "con" I suppose, if fights over which language is better ends up diluting efforts to work on or with either.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 9 points 11 months ago

Even visiting without an account is probably enough - whoopsie, I committed a tewworism.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 8 points 11 months ago

Hrm, a musical you say...?

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago

Fuck yeah. We are often our own worst enemies. Especially you:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

System Update

I was assigned one, but decided that it was wrong. Now I'm arguably the same one, but I feel like a massive improvement.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 11 months ago

Right, so whether they "can't" or simply "won't", either way they don't, and the problem just grows and grows with no bounds.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 11 months ago

Mind you, it's not perfect, and it definitely needs to grow or it will fall back into obscurity, but it does have a lot going for it:-).

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 11 months ago

Oh yes, and if that is how you interpreted what I said, then thank you for taking it in stride and responding in a good-natured way. But if you go back and re-read it... I feel like what I said had a lot more to do with him than you pointing that out about him:-).

i.e., he is pretentious, claiming to "know" things, but (seemingly?) lacking in the area of humility, or even just precision, which is to know and express clearly where one's own knowledge ends and instead one's lack of knowledge begins.

And that is exactly what Tyson has built up his career around trying to tell people! e.g. "you don't know shit!" (while ignoring the limitations of his own sphere of knowledge)

In point of fact though, YOU know where your knowledge ends, i.e. have humility, thus it is quite obvious that you are nothing at all like Tyson:-P. 😅

I suppose what I am saying - and I may not express myself clearly here but I will try:-D - is that Tyson is correct: for people in a LEADERSHIP role (like scientists & educators), rather than blurt out whatever thoughts first come to our mind, we would do well to think it through and stfu with our interjections of things that go beyond the plain and simple facts. The weird part is, he made his career out of doing precisely the opposite of that! He blurts out his own thoughts about their thoughts, and people loved that "drama" so he just never stops.

He is a victim of his own success in a way, except as you say, he is the one who stepped up into that role, not you or I.

img

view more: ‹ prev next ›