Ooops

Are you seriously asking me to cite the law saying that attacking Russian troops as a non-involved party is an attack? I guess someone should start poking you with pan until you can show us the law that clearly defines being poked by pan as an attack.

But jokes aside... international law (especially in regards to armed conflicts) is customary law going back hundreds of years. And even back then they weren't stupid enough to need a defintion of attacking and defending. Because some people believe in humans to have a brain.

An uninvolved country attacking Russian troops is an illegal act of war by definition, declaring the attack beforehand is still an act of war. It doesn't matter if it's in Ukraine, in Russia in free international waters or anywhere else. The actual only exception is when doing it by madate of the UN to restore peace.

Are you really so dense to think NATO countries can attack other countries, then claim to be attacked when that country shoots back by pretending their attack was actually defense? Sorry, but back to above's pan it is...

And you do realize that nobody gives a shit about Russian bullshit claims in comparison to actual international law? Which is indeed the reason nobody sends NATO soldiers to to fight in Ukraine as it wouldn't be some none-sensical claim then but reality.

If they landed (in a non-emergency) in NATO countries and more importantly took off from there, then that country would obviously be an active participant in the war. Also voiding NATO Article 5 protection because you can't claim to be attacked when you voluntarily joined the fight.

You also make me laugh. For you are so drunk on hating the west that you can't even fathom (or care to look up) that these are their actual air force with the first replacements coming in only beginning this year.

Sure, all these stupid Westerners not giving their armies away is really despicable... if you are an idiot.

so much for “German Quality”

Their wind power division is called Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, headquartered in Zamudio (Spain). Their main production, blades for turbines in particular which have massive quality issues and cost them billions, sits in Aveiro (Portugal), with only some minor production (mainly nacelles and R&D) done in Germany and Denmark (also China, US and Canada, but those are mostly irrelevant for the bulk production in Europe).

A parent company sitting in Germany doesn't make it German quality production when everything is outsourced.

Nope... competing industries had to get killed to keep coal alive because that's what lobbyists would reward politicians for with lucrative jobs after their political career. For this reason the former German government for example killed an once world-leading solar industry via massive overregulation... 100k jobs gone to keep 10k coal miners in their job.

For reference: The US recently talked about further increasing their production from the original ~25k/month planned for 2024. That's 300k for the whole country.

Are we actually pretending that no one else can produce shells and it's all about a single German company?

May I ask which comment you are refering to? Because above I actually reacted in the same way. By telling people they are wrong and parroting narratives. Then I explained in detail and with sources to someone actively asking.

It's basically filtering. 90% will not care ayway. Of the remaining 10% some will ask, some will look up facts themselves and learn something new. Or they will come back with links of the usual media narrative, which is still a plus as they actually cared to look it up. So they will probably also take a look at other provided sources. From my perspective that is consistent.

And no, I don't think I can really fight bullshit. Because I have a life and am not paid for this. Unlike the army of people paid by lobbyists to push false narratives. So I will decide where to focus my limited time.

Sorry, but I'm not paid for using Google for other people. Anyone interested in the actual topic will be able to find actual numbers about coal use in Germany within 10 seconds. Everyone more interested in the narratives will not care anyway.

Guess what happens if you type "coal use Germany 2022 vs 2023" into Google... My first hit is this:

"Decline in nuclear and fossil generation. The last three nuclear power plants generated 6.7 TWh until their shutdown on April 15. In the first half of 2022, the figure was 15.8 TWh. Coal-fired power generation also fell: Lignite-fired power plants generated about 41.2 TWh, a sharp decline of 21 percent from 2022 (52.1 TWh). Net production from coal-fired power plants also decreased by 23 percent, from 26.2 TWh in 2022 down to 20.1 TWh in 2023."

Am I supposed to assume it's an accident that the narrative is persistent when reality and actual facts are only one click away?

Also dein Vorschlag ist, nicht Desinformation und Lügen strafrechtlich zu verfolgen, sondern stattdessen die menschliche Natur zu ändern?

Hey, ich bin sofort dabei. Aber der Plan ist schon recht ambitioniert.

Germany power production 1990-2020

"The amount of electricity generated from fossil and conventional energy sources decreased by 12.2% in the first half of 2023 compared to the same period last year. The largest decrease, 22%, was measured for electricity generation from coal."

2022 vs. first half fo 2023

So every one using the same public data is wrong but the BBC... Got it.

Yeah, we could instead reduce coal to a historic low while building renewables...

Oh, wait. That is what is actually happening. But people keeping lying and pretend that there is an increase in coal instead because that's what propagandists pay for.