Ooops

Correct. There are still games that don't work because there is actual work being done to make them not work.

I wonder where the problem is... must be Linux' fault.

Arbeitet sie jetzt stattdessen irgendwo, wo sie ihre vorgeschlagenen Umerziehungslager für unliebsame Journalisten umsetzen kann?

kann man in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung endlich diese Differenz zwischen Industrieller Landwirtschaft und der viel beschworenen bäuerlichen Landwirtschaft in den Vordergrund rücken.

Das könnte man auch jetzt tun, wenn Bauern von der Lebensmittelindustrie, denn nichts anderes sind Bauerverbände in Wahrheit, dazu angestifftet werden, für Subventionen zu kämpfen, die ihnen schaden.

Wird aber nicht gemacht (und würde auch dann nicht gemacht werden), weil es nunmal nicht darum geht, irgendetwas in die öffentliche Wahrnehmung zu rücken, sondern diese zu manipulieren.

Not copying the rhetoric of the right might be a good start

You mean like they did for nearly two years before that headline, while constantly losing votes because they wouldn't address the imaginary problem Germans are brain-washed to believe in.

I would have loved to see a proper "we don't have an immigration problem but one of integration"... but then they would be below 5% in the polls already.

Unironisch ja.

Das ist gutes und bewusstes Timing, um der Verharmlosung und Relativierung, die bereits betrieben wird, ein zweites Standbein zu geben: Ablenkung durch andere völlig bekloppte Themen. Der ebenfalls heute aus Reihen der CDU kommende Vorstoss "Wir sind bereit das Grundgesetz zu ändern, um härter gegen Bedürftige vorgehen zu können" zielt in die selbe Kerbe.

So you are still at the "dead birds" part of the fairy tale retelling? It will get from shit show to clown show once they move on to try arguing with "science" like the imaginary health issues caused by infrasound.

Er werbe hingegen dafür, “mit aller Konsequenz auch den politischen Meinungskampf gegen die AfD” fortzusetzen

Da man etwas, das man noch nie getan hat, nicht "fortsetzen" kann, gehe ich von einem Tippfehler aus und da soll eigentlich "Meinungskampf für die AfD" stehen...

Says the guy cheerleading genocide committed by an authoritarian regime.

Problem is I didn't. I called out bad journalism. Because bullshit narratives and tribalism make any actual discussion meaningless.

But then your see something that is seemingly criticising "your team" and instantly your delusions get triggered and you hallucinate how I "cheerlead for genocide" when I did actually not say anything other than that this report is polemic low quality bullshit.

There is a very clear and limit and number. It's zero. Zero people should be bombed. Zero people would be bombed without a despicable terror attack against Israel (oh, wait... as I just learned in this very thread here this never actually happened and it was a legitimate military attack against military targets somehow...). Zero people would be bombed without Hamas using the population as human shields. Also zero people should have been killed on October 7. Zero rockets should be fired each day at Israel. And zero neighbouring countries or factions should cheer for a newe excuse to attack Israel.

Do you want to know another relevance regarding that number? If you have no ability to argue without questioning the general right of Israel to exist, without questioning any right of self defense, without questionings if Israel was actually attacked, and without falling back to a "oh, the evil Jews are plotting together with corrupt world leaders again..."-narratives, then you have zero valid arguments, because you are a fucking anti-semite.

And then you have zero legitimacy to argue

So, again. Slowly this time because you -probably intentionally, but I'm an optimist by heart- seemed to have missed it: This pile of shit is not journalism. It would be low effort even for an opinion piece, which it isn't. It's full of polemics, lies and can't even manage too stay internally consistent (a "litany" of arguments is at the same time not existing, facts become claims when mentioned by Israel, while claims become facts when it's against them...) or free of anti-semite narratives.

I know... in this world where arguing about people killing each other has become a team sport and everything needs to be black and white it's nearly inconceivable but... Pause for a moment, take a deep breath and try to imagine just for one moment the following -nowadays neartly heretical- thought: Israel's government can be a clownshow of genocidal morons, Hamas is the exact same, and at the same time 70%+ of the people arguing against Israel are still doing so not based on facts but on anti-semitic narratives. And those people need to called out on their bullshit. Because not doing it devaluates the actual discussion. If I can't call out bullshit arguments as bullshit without being attacked for supporting a genocide, how is this or any discussion (or any court case) legitimate, if we all see clearly that it's not about the arguments but a popularity contest between two teams.

Which is what I did. I called this trashy piece of non-journalism out. And for this I now have been called insane, toxic and a supporter of genocide. Because you are brain-washed into believing this is a team sport, so you happily accept anti-semites on your team that is obviously better than the enemy.... Guess what. It's not. You are both wrong.

Sorry to tell you, but team "I accept anti-semitism, lies and bullshit and ignore Hamas, because I'm pro-Palestine" is just as insane as team "Every crticism is anti-semitism, "targeted area bombing" and deportation plans aren't crazy".

So then tell me about that context...

"I don't want to hear it, so you most be toxic" isn't context. That's just you being part of the team "Cheerleading for terrorism".