I wonder how many times I've been given away then.
OneOfNaturesMysteries
It is implied: most people do expect to keep a game if they buy it. There's no expectation to keep an arcade machine after inserting coins. Everyone who paid for extra lives or whatever powerups should have done so with a clear expectation that the online game that they haven't purchased will die eventually. Nobody is being duped or betrayed.
Giving it out for free would be nice and probably wouldn't cost them too much, but it's also unreasonable to demand something that was never promised. Damn, I can't believe I'm defending some free-to-play pay-to-win microtransaction online service hell game, but I guess even they can do something ~~right~~ not wrong every now and then.
I tried to look at what they were selling and it doesn't seem like anything you're buying is actual content, but rather a shortcut to success. Microtransactions suck, but if ownership wasn't promised or implied anywhere, what are the players exactly entitled to? I just don't see any lies, broken promises, or failed expectations.
What, they should just make games for free?
I sure didn't expect this from a free-to-play game. Nice job, GHM
Non-FOSS time machine? It's 2005 as a service. Monthly subscription.
You get 30 cents from every 125, so yeah. EA clearly isn't half-assing the roblox experience.
Ew, disgusting. Also, 24% cut for the creator abysmal. What a joke.
Knight dress-up or running around naked. It's got something for everyone.
~~Guitar hero~~ New Vegas will never be the same again
Holding alt isn't that big of a hoop.