An interesting test case. Wikipedia contains vast amounts of information about harmful items, and children will use it. Ultimately libraries don't restrict lending and so I suspect the article here illustrates that they shall emerge victorious
Reading anything exciting? I'm pushing through The Silmarillion this summer, great in parts, poor in chapters too though
I agree. But I suspect most small forums are still exempt reading this article and the law. If you don't have potential to cause harm (no porn essentially) you don't need to do anything. But this has yet to be tested in a court to set any case law yet and so forums are understandably being very cautious
Oh-my-bash. All of the upsides. None of the down
Nice, that sounds bliss. Massages, spa, dinner booked?
Wish me luck. Travel hell the noo with weans! Stuck in an airport :(
If you don't have ipv6 internally, you probably can't access ipv6 externally. 6to4 gateways are a thing. 4to6? Not so much.
And this is why ipv6 will ultimately take another 20 years for full coverage. If it was more backwards compatible from the starting address-wise then this would all have been smoother. Should have stuck with point separators. Should have assumed zero padding for v4 style addresses rather than a prefix
Fantastic, only seen a few posted to Mastodon. Will keep an eye out in August to see if he does come to Edinburgh
Doesn't sound like a Labour government to me
I thought base of the neck. And it something that I don't want to see in the game. I agree with Schmidt saying it is contrary to player welfare. But it was also legal, a textbook clearout, and rugby has these incidents if you want a ruck. Joining a ruck is certainly where we find the greatest risk with the tackling height lowered
Where you live is a proxy of your class and status btw. And it's total bullshit. It also isn't a Scotland phenomenon. Liverpool and Washington oop norf also experience this. I'm sure it's measurable in Germany or France too. And let's not think about central NY vs outskirts New Orleans
What this is showing is how entrenched we are. It is so hard to transcend a class system. We're not far from a caste system, as Edinburgh University has presented recently
And yet, if you read act: there is a reasonable argument within the legislation. And the article posted mentions it too, from the architect. So you are correct in the fact the size of the site matters not. But if you are reasonably not about questionable matetial, you are likely exempt. Which is essentially what wikipedia are testing. So call it an overreach all you want; but this is yet to be proven